User talk:Zero1328/Archive2

This is an archive of my talkpage, containing discussions from 2007. The diff of the text removed is here.

Spirited Away

Ah wow, good job. I wasn't reading the article, I was just dropping by my watchlist. The only thing shown on the diff was the part I reverted. =/ O Violinista 07:45, 1 January 2007 (UTC)

WP:ADOPT

Hi there,

Looking through our Archives I saw that you took an interest in the Adopt-a-user program during its formation and development. Well this is just a quick message to tell you the program is well and truly lifted off, with over 200 users involved in the program, 50+ active Adopters and approx. 150 Adoptees, and always expanding. If your still interested please pop by WP:ADOPT, have a look around and ask any questions you want on our talk page. Look forward to seeing you there. Cheers Lethaniol 15:36, 13 January 2007 (UTC)

Cactuar

Thanks for picking up the vandalism that I did not pick up. I did not realize Plattler01 did not revert all changes by 152.117.244.161. Thanks a lot for correcting it. --Cyktsui 04:35, 23 January 2007 (UTC)

Re: Image:KN2006 Ayu.jpg

Yes, I realize that the image title may not fit what appears as the image now, but it is much easier to deal with than editing the character page and going through the process of uploading more images. Plus, this way there are no orphaned images left behind. I don't think the image title is very important anyway since the image is explained to be from the game in the summary section anyway. So please don't revert it back to what it was.--(十八) 08:51, 11 February 2007 (UTC)

BassxForte

Just stop replying, he's seriously never going to get it. Hell, look what he just added to his page.—ウルタプ 05:52, 6 March 2007 (UTC)

Falling Sand Game

It was an AfD not a prod. For future reference the template links to the AfD right there in the pink box! --Steve _(Slf67) ^talk 09:26, 10 March 2007 (UTC)

I noticed you removed my link

To Kingdom Hearts OST MP3s, why? I have the "OK" from Dirk to add it. Read our disscussion page for more details. Heres the link to the disscusion if you cant find it: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:86.212.172.17 --The Heartless

Well, for the first thing, I don't know why my ips changed. Also, sorry I thought I was logged in..maybe it was before I made this account. Anyways, secondly I didn't see any rule that I broke. Thirdly, I have a disclaimer up. Fourthly, you allow Kingdom Hearts Ultimania to stay on the external links for the Kingdom Hearts artical and they have 'illegal' mp3 downloads on they're site as well. Why?--The Heartless

I see. Well thanks for taking your time and telling me why I can't link there. Is there any Kingdom Hearts article that you think I could add my site to the external links to help people out? Thanks again ----The Heartless 11:19, 18 March 2007 (UTC)

Okay, thanks. I'll come back and try again once I get my site completely finished and up to date on Kingdom Hearts information. Chao ----The Heartless 11:48, 18 March 2007 (UTC)

Roxas

I note what they saw, i'm a rational fellow, and am always willing to accept flaws in my argument, but as long as just 1 of my points have merit, I will keep argueing. BassxForte 17:24, 20 March 2007 (UTC)

Also, do you expect me to just roll over and admit defeat? That goes against my personal way of life, if I just give up because a few people disagree with me, then it means I lack the willpower to stand up to a crowd, which is a sign of weakness, I am not weak, clear? BassxForte 22:02, 21 March 2007 (UTC)

The fact you, Apostrophe, Uruptu, ang Geg always try to go against what I do has lead me to believe its done out of conttempt for me, since you all have reverted everything i've done, regardless of the fact most of the time you argue the wrong, on most pages we come into conflict over. BassxForte 15:41, 22 March 2007 (UTC)

I know you and the other two haven't been stalking my edits, I was just pointing out I seem to come into conflict with you three a lot. BassxForte 22:15, 22 March 2007 (UTC)

Re:Ciel

Don't get yourself involved in this, besides, things look to be cooling down now. BassxForte 04:10, 24 March 2007 (UTC)

Forgot? I don't remember learning anything, the mention of Roxas will get on the page, no matter how many hurdles I have to cross. BassxForte 04:16, 25 March 2007 (UTC)

Ok

You want another discussion of mindless bickering? Fine. But keep in mind that 24 block I wnet through was completly injust. BassxForte 23:01, 4 April 2007 (UTC)

Admin interferance

This is completly unneccesary and uncalled for, do you relize what happens when someone (ie:you) plays their hand too early? Not only does it not solve the problem, it only causes the problem to grow worse. BassxForte 21:01, 7 April 2007 (UTC)

Do you realize what you just did? You did the same thing I did about Roxas, since the solution of the first attempt wasn't what you desired you just made a second attempt, wikipedia isn't a "I gotta win, I don't care how many tries!" website. BassxForte 20:36, 10 April 2007 (UTC)

When I mentioned stubborness on my user page, I was reffering to real life, not wikipedia. BassxForte 00:20, 11 April 2007 (UTC)

By the way, since when did I ever say I was aware that these were "bad" actions? Either that was a lie on your part, or someone else got on my account. BassxForte 00:25, 11 April 2007 (UTC)

I will not waste my time with the biased opinion of other editors, I will not deal with your biased opinions against me, i'm not even going to your RFC page. BassxForte 15:59, 11 April 2007 (UTC)

It has been my experiance that when another user gets to the point he/she can't be reasoned with it's just best to ignore them. BassxForte 00:33, 12 April 2007 (UTC)

Fine, I edited the page detailing my thoughts on your uneccessary measures, now go away, never go to my user page about this subject ever again. BassxForte 00:45, 12 April 2007 (UTC)

Any further mentions about Roxas or things involving this so called "attitude problem" of mine shall be deleted out right, I won't take your biased opinions anymore. BassxForte 03:01, 12 April 2007 (UTC)

Re: You've made a good first impression

Much thanks. I'm currently still looking around for a page that seems to be in particular need of help, so I can bring something back around. I've been wandering around the site somewhat haphazardously, looking at talk pages and the like. I happened upon the Organization XIII talk page out of curiousity (sp?) and found BassxForte's case to be interesting. I suppose it is really not my business to question anybody's logical disposition, but I have a thing for psychology, so I had to wonder what drives him so far into his beliefs. I kind of realized that there weren't any moderators per se, but I get kind of confused when I get overly focused on other aspects, so I can sometimes ramble. I'm sorry if I seemed nosy on the BassxForte respect, as I wasn't a part of the arguement at all. I didn't actually notice the page until a day after the fighting went on, so I was just a late bystander. I will probably keep track of BassxForte's case on a self-interest note, but I will try to keep my feelings out of it and focus more on building up wikipedia. Regards - GDR of the Moon 02:26, 11 April 2007 (UTC)

Why?

Why exactly are you like this with Org XIII? On most talk pages you have acted reasonable and logical, but on Org XIII anything you say is correct, but you say it biased in your favor, more biased then I would think should be on a wiki, it's the same with the other editors too, i'm gonna take a 2 week break off of wikipedia to get my mind off of this, however if my belief in that the mention about Roxas hasn't changed, you and the others had better give arguments a helluva lot better then your current arguments. BassxForte 18:00, 16 April 2007 (UTC)

Reply: CVG->VG edits

For clarity, I've posted an in-depth explanation and reply to your concern on my talk page. I appreciate your comments. *Vendetta* _{(whois talk edits)} 13:32, 18 April 2007 (UTC)

Unusual Vandilism

Hello Zero1328. This is the IP address of BassxForte, during my wiki break I generally look over my userpage to make sure no one tries to damage it in my absense, while I was going through the "history" section on the main part of my user page, I noticed you reverted nonsense on my userpage, while I would have changed it back myself, exactly what did those symbols mean? i've never seen them before although i'm sure they came from somewhere, although it's unlikly this vandal was trying to give me a actual message. 74.193.120.225 04:28, 19 April 2007 (UTC)

Calm down, as long as i'm on my wikibreak i only care about the maintaince of my userpage, now answer me, unless you desire to be in violation of a very important rule. 74.193.120.225 18:07, 19 April 2007 (UTC)

ALTIMIT comment reply

I understand what your are saying, but I am not the only source, We have an entire community who recognizes us, as well as Bandai Corporation. Bandai also acknowledges us as ALTIMIT and creating the actual ALTIMIT. We know this because we discussed everything with them before we started on order to obtain the right to use their copyrights. I am just the only source posting on wiki.

Return

I have returned... and after thinking about it for some time... i'm under the belief that I haven't done anything uncivil yet, i've gone through this thing you put me on.. W P:RFC or something... none of the "examples" it has show me acting uncivil... in fact, the only wiki rule i've seen myself break was 3RR. (Note, it is April 30th where I am, it's probably that date where you are too, but I said that just so you know) BassxForte 18:01, 30 April 2007 (UTC)

I have not regonized any of my actions as uncivil, although i've seen many of them acting uncivil towards me, their uncivil attitude is seemingly quarintined to the org XIII page, nonetheless, don't expect me to return to the org XIII talk page until you and the other users begin acting reasonable. BassxForte 17:34, 1 May 2007 (UTC)

Please stop... i've really had enough of you trying to make me do what you want, im not any less of a person then you, you do not have the right to force me to leave, especially since i've done nothing that would justify it. BassxForte 23:51, 2 May 2007 (UTC)

Just don't come to my talkpage again unless it is absolutly urgent, although wikipedia does not tolerate things that could vaugely be interpeted into personal attacks... all users tend to get a general... distaste... for other certain users. BassxForte 03:31, 4 May 2007 (UTC)

From Ciel page

"Zero: I tried to insert the reference, and the tag (1), is there, but it's not working, probably due to the different format the others have. I'm not very familiar with cite-linking in the first place, so could you see if you can figure out how to fix it?KrytenKoro 00:56, 23 May 2007 (UTC)"KrytenKoro 04:51, 23 May 2007 (UTC)

Ciel third opinion

The Megaman project page should be a good place to get help.

I really don't know how else to approach it - I don't want to be arguing with him, but the game also makes it clear that the first scene isn't a contradiction to the citation I gave, and I can't bring myself to subvert my own integrity.KrytenKoro 03:15, 3 June 2007 (UTC)

truth

im not a troll i just side with ttn and want the the the dicussion to end as fast as possible i see ttn as a police man enforcing j walking walls at a busy street he is doing the right thing even though its un popular to ticket j walkers especially since the ppl on boths sides love each other and ttn is ticketing both I want this to end fast even if it might be bloody and i see rightness in this because ttn gave more than a year the articles to be expanded and well they havent soo he is mass ticketing and if it forces a riot then the superheros(admins) will come in and end it

lets see i start a riot now i get blamed and blocked for a month or longer and maybe a few others or this either contuine on to full out battle with massive long blocks with wiki community really hurt - this is my prediction since ive seen a lack of real admins getting into this unless they get in this before the breaking point then there will be battle i rather be a scapegoat and go back to articles i like rather than having it overflow and distrubt wiki (wiki gets attacked by terrorists/cyverterrorists or is rioted) and all hell breaks loose ttn is a cop doing right thing and ill support him even if i have to be scapegoat for the right thing to contuine Agentheartlesspain 04:41, 12 June 2007 (UTC)

Added comment on RfC for BassxForte

Coming into this blind (I heard about his alter ego Vilerocks opposing TTN's merging campaign), I elected to leave a third-party opine. This RfC still going on, anyway? Suigi 07:33, 12 June 2007 (UTC)

Fair enough. Good luck with that endeavour. Suigi 16:46, 12 June 2007 (UTC)

RE: a slight correction

Dear oh dear! I tend to get very frustrated by people who are unwilling to listen to reasonable logic and this user seems to be one of them. I commented at the community sanction board towards my recent account of his actions; I just hope some sensible action is taken. I say let the facts speak for themselves! I hope you don't have to put up with it for very much longer- stuff like this makes a tense environment for editing for everyone.

Seraphim Whipp 10:54, 13 June 2007 (UTC)

DreamGuy

• You were kind enough to provide advice on the Mythology article regarding User:DreamGuy a few weeks ago, who had accused me of lying,[1] and you responded according.[2]
• Another user made some amendments, and DreamGuy removed them completely, which I responded to thoroughly.[3] Since there was no response to my comments, I reverted the changes, made some edits and added another section.
• DreamGuy has now accused me of "deceptiion and bad faith"[4], and that anything I add will be removed on sight.
• I have commented on the Talk:mythology page, but what else can/should I do? --84.9.191.165 01:11, 16 June 2007 (UTC)

Mario Kart DS Tracks

Just to add to what TTN said, "game guide information" is part of WP:NOT. This page lists what does not belong on Wikipedia. Under WP:NOT#IINFO, it mentions that information that makes it like a guide or manual, or if it's written that way, does not go here. - Zero1328 _Talk? 01:23, 18 June 2007 (UTC)

Was the track info on Mario Kart DS WP:NOT#IINFO? Here's the old version: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Mario_Kart_DS&oldid=138322716#Tracks. The whole conversation came about because I wanted to put something like this on the Mario Kart 64 article. What do you think? I don't know if it is worth fighting TTN over, though.  :-P  DangerousNerd  talk 16:54, 18 June 2007 (UTC)

It would go under #4. "video game guides" count as an instruction manual, and track information would count as something belonging in a game guide. - Zero1328 _Talk? 03:19, 19 June 2007 (UTC)

think i firgured whats going on there policies and all and like wiki policies vs wikipedia policies Agentheartlesspain 21:11, 19 June 2007 (UTC)

The Tireless Contributor Barnstar

		The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
		I thought I'd give you this barnstar for your tireless contributions I have been noticing in numerous articles. Wikidudeman (talk) 05:47, 19 June 2007 (UTC)

DreamGuy: 3rd complain

Further to your earlier intervention, I felt I had no choice but to report DreamGuy again at WP:ANI here, for yet another revert in the article on Mythology, which I have also mentioned on the Mythology talk page. --84.9.191.165 13:25, 21 June 2007 (UTC)

Vision Thing

Hi. I have requested an abitrtation case against User:Vision Thing. If you wish to participate, here is the link: Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration#Vision_Thing. :) -- infinity0 12:25, 30 June 2007 (UTC)

Oh, sorry yeah, thanks for that edit. :) I didn't think it was that necessary, considering links to the talk pages were just 3 lines above it. -- infinity0 12:54, 30 June 2007 (UTC)

mmhmm, I appreciate the gesture :) thanks again! -- infinity0 13:00, 30 June 2007 (UTC)

If it gets accepted, could you give an outside opinion? At the moment the parties consist just of people who have had conflicts with VT, but I think your (hopefully considered to be neutral) input on his actions at Anarchism would be informative and useful. -- infinity0 13:06, 30 June 2007 (UTC)

Angie's RfC

Thanks for sorting it out :-).

Seraphim ^Whipp 09:48, 6 July 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Megaman powerbattle1.png

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Megaman powerbattle1.png. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ejfetters 11:14, 6 August 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Megaman powerbattle2.png

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Megaman powerbattle2.png. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ejfetters 11:16, 6 August 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Megaman2 powerfighters1.png

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Megaman2 powerfighters1.png. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ejfetters 11:37, 6 August 2007 (UTC)

Soul Calibur III: Reply

I did try moving using the usual method, but there were problems. A user moved most(but not all) Soul Calibur articles, because the newest(Soulcalibur IV) was spelt as one word instead as the usual two words(as in Soul Calibur). He then moved each article again, so each Soul Calibur article, as well as spelling Soul Calibur as one word(as Soulcalibur), had each letter in higher case(in other words, Soul Calibur was spelt as SOULCALIBUR). I stumbled upon these changes. I was able to move the Soulcalibur IV and Legends articles using the usual method, but wasn't able to move the other articles back to their original places this way. I subsequently decided to move them back as I did; the only method that I myself could impliment. Michael Mad 13:21, 17 August 2007 (UTC)

Orange article

Sorry, I am a bit angry here. You have just chopped out about an hour of work I did on the orange article with no comment except the information was "too US-centric". As if, what, oranges in the United States are not important? Temple oranges cannot be mentioned in Wikipedia because they are only grown in the US?

If you want to restructure something to set apart particular countries, fine. Just chopping out important, valid, noncontroversial information on a subject is not acceptable editing. Please be a little more sensitive to other people's time and work. Apollo 11:55, 21 August 2007 (UTC)

Feel free to restructure material need be, but if something constitutes relevant fact, don't eliminate it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Masonbarge (talk • contribs) 11:56, 21 August 2007 (UTC)

Wachowski

Hello. Are you sure about all this sex change stuff? It seems that it is an urban legend; look here. Joel Silver says : "It’s all untrue. They just don’t do interviews, so people make things up.” Could you please cancel you action of changing the names ? If we don't have something official about that, we should just say nothing! ziel & 16:51, 6 September 2007 (UTC)

Haha

Yeah, Im registered, I just forgot to sign in when i edited the article then i was like "crap, oh well, somebody will figure it out, haha." -- Noj_R 10:37, 23 October 2007 (UTC)