|
¡Hello, F3rn4ndo!
Thanks for your answer to my question on this page [[1]] Another question: In which country(ies) did you learn there were six continents? Does everyone learn the same thing there or do you get into heated arguments about Antartica? :) Thanks! Dblomgren 23:18, 5 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I'm hoping you're be willing to remove it, per WP:SIG#Images "Images of any kind should not be used in signatures", thanks --Michael Billington (talk • contribs) 10:26, 8 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
After lots of NPOV problems, I have recently done a major rewrite on the Opus Dei article and am requesting comments on its talk page. I think the new page is better, but there are a lot of single-purpose accounts who have been edit warring with me over it. I noticed that last April, you commented some on the article and made some suggestions I've tried to implement. Could you look over the page and comment on whether the rewrite is an improvment and maybe help out in the ensuing discussion? --Alecmconroy 11:50, 27 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for uploading Image:Auunicol.png. I notice the 'image' page currently specifies that the image is unlicensed for use on Wikipedia and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr.) 15:36, 31 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Le escribo para preguntarle que licencia tiene el Escudo de Cúcuta que usted subió (este). Gracias por su pronta respuesta,
--Ricardocolombia 16:22, 13 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Segun el articulo sobre cucuta en español que dice "Este artículo incorpora material de Gobernación Nte. de Sder., que mediante una autorización permitió agregar contenido e imágenes y publicarlos bajo licencia GFDL" Ud. mismo consiguio ese permiso.. o no? eso incluye la IMAGEN del escudo.. [2]--F3rn4nd0 BLA BLA BLA 15:57, 14 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Pero es que esa imagen no está en la página web de la Gobernación de Norte de Santander. ¿De dónde lo sacó? ¿Ud. lo hizo? Gracias por su pronta respuesta, --Ricardocolombia 15:04, 16 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Si, yo le rediseñe el interior y le puse bajo licencia GFDL.--((F3rn4nd0 ))(BLA BLA BLA) 15:05, 16 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, I realize your Spanish may be better than mine, but, the English translation and syntax change you made to:
- Hasta que la plata nos separe (2006) (Until Money do Us Apart) TV Series
makes no sense. Literally, translates as Until the silver separates to us. Silver is money. The best translation is Until Money Separates Us or Until Money Parts Us.
I do realize that you probably have seen the show directly. I only have seen limited clips. Please see which translation you like and then please make a change. As it stands now, the sentence makes no sense. Morenooso 00:33, 23 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
hi there, I think the title is meant to be a sarcasm to the expression which is also used in english as "until (or till) death do us apart". I'll let you decide, it's fine with me.. --((F3rn4nd0 ))(BLA BLA BLA) 00:42, 23 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- You know what? I like your second thought - Til Death Do Us Apart or even Til Death Do Us Part. I would rather see you make the change because I don't want the next editor to think I am trying to over-ride you and take possession of the page. I am working on cleaning up some Spanish articles. Please see:
Gracias, Morenooso 01:36, 23 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- About the edit to his directing credit, yes, he is not American but was placed in the category for having produced an episode of Ugly Betty. Not many foreign nationals get an opportunity like this. It is probably a tip of the hat to his contribution to the series with its Televisa predecessors.
- I placed it there but will bow to you on this. Morenooso 17:10, 8 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button  located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! alphachimp 07:32, 23 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia, F3rn4nd0! However, your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove spam from Wikipedia. If you were trying to insert a good link, please accept my creator's apologies, but please note that the link you added in is on my spam blacklist and should not be included in Wikipedia. Please read Wikipedia's external links policy for more information. If the link was to an Imageshack or Photobucket image, please read Wikipedia's image tutorial on how to use a more appropriate method to insert the image into an article. If your link was genuine spam, please note that inserting spam into Wikipedia is against policy. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! Shadowbot 07:52, 23 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
{{helpme}}
Hello, I need the assistance of an admin to move the article Valledupar to Valledupar, Cesar can someone help please?--((F3rn4nd0 ))(BLA BLA BLA) 05:37, 26 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The way to do this is to request it on Wikipedia:Requested moves, which User:CyclePat seems to have already done. After waiting for a while for possible oppose votes to surface, an admin will delete Valledupar, Cesar and move Valledupar to it. GracenotesT § 06:01, 26 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
A que se refiere con desearme suerte con el artículo de Cúcuta
--Ricardocolombia 10:03, 28 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for uploading Image:Caliseal1.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 15:03, 28 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Yup, out of control, thanks for noticing and posting and asking. KP Botany 22:44, 29 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for uploading Image:40.llevamecontigojorgeonate.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 11:15, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Please go to the Requested Moves process for moving the article as this is not uncontroversial. Naming for the sake of consistency in a single category is not a widely agreed upon principle. Thanks. --Polaron | Talk 17:21, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Re: [3]
Really gorgeous box. I was the person who added 99% of the content of U.S.-Colombia military relations, (it was originally part of my required law school writing requirement).
I think your contibution is beautiful, thank you so much for making my weekend :) Travb (talk) 16:18, 3 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Español
Yo fui bloqueado en la Wikipedia Española por SPAM Interno, no por violaciones a los derechos de autor. Le pido el favor que no vuelva a revertir mis ediciones con justificaciones como esa.
Muchas gracias,
Ricardocolombia 02:59, 5 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Changes to cucuta
- Until the information about the GFDL status gets verified from those websites I recommend you stop adding information related to that source or adding the spam you added in the spanish wiki into the english wiki. What are you trying to achieve? another block? take a break!!
- --((F3rn4nd0 ))(BLA BLA BLA) 04:23, 5 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- ¿De qué habla?
- ¿Fernando de qué está hablando? ¿Verificación de cuáles sitios? ¿De cuál status de GFDL? Contesteme en español... o si quiere en ambos idiomas. Por otro lado al Spam que usted se refiere fue por enviar a varios bibliotecarios un mensaje pidiendoles su opinión respecto del artículo de Cúcuta en la versión española... por eso me bloquearon.
- --Ricardocolombia 05:30, 5 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Verificación hecha
- La verdad esa autorización fue verificada por Nuria hace mucho tiempo.
- Mire la última parte de la autorización ---> Click aquí
- --Ricardocolombia 05:59, 5 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
How would you translate this from spanish to english?
El Congreso elegido en Angostura se reúne esta vez en Villa del Rosario, en Cúcuta, a principios de 1821.
Tras la Batalla de Carabobo, el 24 de junio de 1821, que dio oficialmente la independencia de Venezuela, y luego de la liberación de Caracas, Cartagena, Popayán y Santa Marta, el 18 de Julio se reanudó con mayor ímpetu los trabajos de constitucionales en Cúcuta para incluir las regiones recién emancipadas.
El 30 de agosto de 1821 es proclamada la Constitución de Cúcuta y se expide el 12 de Julio. Estas se ha considerado como la primera Constitución de Colombia que estuvo vigente durante la Gran Colombia hasta su disolución 1831. Esta constaba de 10 capítulos y 91 artículos:
Thanks,
Ricardocolombia 11:33, 10 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
¿El siguiente parrafo está correcto de acuerdo con la gramatica inglesa?
The real name of the city is "San José de Cúcuta". "San José" for the name of the father of Jesus and "Cúcuta" by an indigenous group called Barí. Cúcuta means "House of goblins"
Gracias,
--Ricardocolombia 15:43, 11 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- "Acedillo means quiver --F3rn4nd0" Thanks. Made the change. Unimaginative Username 19:13, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for uploading Image:Atlanticomap.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.
As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self-no-disclaimers}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.
If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 03:21, 20 February 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. —Bkell (talk) 03:21, 20 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Saludos, Fernando.
¿Puedes hacer un mapa para Villavicencio igual que el que hiciste para Valledupar?
Gracias. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Phranciscusmagnus (talk • contribs) 00:14, 23 February 2007 (UTC).[reply]
If you actually looked at the article history I was not the one who created the article in the first place. The reason I left a redirect as opposed to moving or deleting the page is so that someone searching for the name without using the specialized characters present in the Andrés lópez article it redirects to would still be able to find it. Improbcat 17:47, 2 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Hola. Quisiera primero preguntarte si tienes cuenta en Wikipedia en inlgés. Si es así, desesperadamente necesito tu ayuda para votar a favor de dejar un articulo acerca de Norte América como región de America.
La Wikipedia en inglés considera Norte America como un continente, desde Canada hasta Panamá. Hice un articulo llamado North America (Americas) en donde se excluye el punto de vista Mexicano y en general Latino y parte Europeo, de que Norte América es una region o subcontinente, que contiene a Canadá, México y los Estados Unidos, además de St. Pierre and Miquelon, Bermuda y Groenlandia.
Un usuario un poco extremista, que siempre trata de poner a México en Centro América, nominó el artículo para borrado, argumentando que no es necesario, pero sí lo es, porque una cosa es la versión inglesa de North America, como continente, y otra la visión de North America como región (US, Can, Mex), igualmente válida.
Por favor, si tienes una cuenta en Wikipedia en inglés que ya tenga historial (o se verá mal nuevos usuarios votando), vota en el artículo (vota KEEP que significa mantenerlo) en el siguiente link: Click aquí para votar. Por favor, apóyanos. --74.110.218.100 22:12, 2 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
| 
