User talk:Zsinj/Archive 16
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 10 | ← | Archive 14 | Archive 15 | Archive 16 |
"Milind Tambe" Wikipedia entry
Hi! Wrt "Milind Tambe" Wikipedia entry, I have suggested that if the page goes back to March 2019 (I had not touched the page before then), and then I suggest edit requests, would that help remove the conflict of interest tags? Milind tambe (talk) 20:52, 1 January 2023 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for January 2
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Riot Games, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Paramount. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 2 January 2023 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – January 2023
News and updates for administrators from the past month (December 2022).
- Speedy deletion criterion A5 (transwikied articles) has been repealed following an unopposed proposal.
- Following the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections, the following editors have been appointed to the Arbitration Committee: Barkeep49, CaptainEek, GeneralNotability, Guerillero, L235, Moneytrees, Primefac, SilkTork.
- The 2021-22 Discretionary Sanctions Review has concluded with many changes to the discretionary sanctions procedure including a change of the name to "contentious topics". The changes are being implemented over the coming month.
- The arbitration case Stephen has been closed.
- Voting for the Sound Logo has closed and the winner is expected to be announced February to April 2023.
- Tech tip: You can view information about IP addresses in a centralised location using bullseye which won the Newcomer award in the recent Coolest Tool Awards.
Block user, sock puppet, cross wiki vandalism
Pls block Kiszek, who is the recent sock of LTA Cheng123xx 202.75.83.59 (talk) 02:00, 12 January 2023 (UTC)
- That user has no contribution history, deleted or otherwise. If they are a sock, please report them to the appropriate LTA investigation. ZsinjTalk 02:02, 12 January 2023 (UTC)
The Englishman
Hello there. I was just wanting to be sure that I did the right thing in this debacle. Seeing a talkpage like that was rather a new experience for me. Thanks, Schminnte (talk • contribs) 21:02, 14 January 2023 (UTC)
- Hi there! Absolutely. They were misusing their talk page and you correctly reverted the inappropriate content. Thanks for all of your contributions! ZsinjTalk 21:09, 14 January 2023 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – February 2023
News and updates for administrators from the past month (January 2023).
|
|
- Following an RfC, the administrator policy now requires that prior written consent be gained from the Arbitration Committee to mark a block as only appealable to the committee.
- Following a community discussion, consensus has been found to impose the extended-confirmed restriction over the topic areas of Armenia and Azerbaijan and Kurds and Kurdistan.
- The Vector 2022 skin has become the default for desktop users of the English Wikipedia.
- The arbitration case Armenia-Azerbaijan 3 has been opened and the proposed decision is expected 24 February 2023.
- In December, the contentious topics procedure was adopted which replaces the former discretionary sanctions system. The contentious topics procedure is now in effect following an initial implementation period. There is a detailed summary of the changes and administrator instructions for the new procedure. The arbitration clerk team are taking suggestions, concerns, and unresolved questions about this new system at their noticeboard.
- Voting in the 2023 Steward elections will begin on 05 February 2023, 21:00 (UTC) and end on 26 February 2023, 21:00 (UTC). The confirmation process of current stewards is being held in parallel. You can automatically check your eligibility to vote.
- Voting in the 2023 Community Wishlist Survey will begin on 10 February 2023 and end on 24 February 2023. You can submit, discuss and revise proposals until 6 February 2023.
- Tech tip: Syntax highlighting is available in both the 2011 and 2017 Wikitext editors. It can help make editing paragraphs with many references or complicated templates easier.
Hi, it's no big deal, but there wasn't actually a "missing word". I assume you're American, as am I, but the phrase "in future" is the way Brits would phrase it, whereas Americans generally would say "in the future". Just thought you might like to know.--Bbb23 (talk) 00:13, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
- Oh, that’s really insightful and I didn’t realize that was a difference between them. Sorry about that! ZsinjTalk 01:04, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
- I only know these things because I watch so many British movies and TV series. Another similar turn of phrase: Brits say "in hospital" rather than "in the hospital". You gotta admit it's more efficient. :-) --Bbb23 (talk) 01:12, 5 February 2023 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – March 2023
News and updates for administrators from the past month (February 2023).
|
|
- Following a request for comment, F10 (useless non-media files) has been deprecated.
- Following a request for comment, the Portal CSD criteria (P1 (portal subject to CSD as an article) and P2 (underpopulated portal)) have been deprecated.
- A request for comment is open to discuss making the closing instructions for the requested moves process a guideline.
- The results of the 2023 Community Wishlist Survey have been posted.
- Remedy 11 ("Request for Comment") of the Conduct in deletion-related editing case has been rescinded.
- The proposed decision for the Armenia-Azerbaijan 3 case is expected 7 March 2023.
- A case related to the Holocaust in Poland is expected to be opened soon.
- The 2023 appointees for the Ombuds commission are AGK, Ameisenigel, Bennylin, Daniuu, Emufarmers, Faendalimas, JJMC89, MdsShakil, Minorax and Renvoy as regular members and Zabe as advisory members.
- Following the 2023 Steward Elections, the following editors have been appointed as stewards: Mykola7, Superpes15, and Xaosflux.
- The Terms of Use update cycle has started, which includes a
[p]roposal for better addressing undisclosed paid editing
. Feedback is being accepted until 24 April 2023.
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 02:47, 31 March 2023 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – April 2023
News and updates for administrators from the past month (March 2023).
|
|
- A community RfC is open to discuss whether reports primarily involving gender-related disputes or controversies should be referred to the Arbitration enforcement noticeboard.
- Some older web browsers will not be able to use JavaScript on Wikimedia wikis starting this week. This mainly affects users of Internet Explorer 11. (T178356)
- The rollback of Vector 2022 RfC has found no consensus to rollback to Vector legacy, but has found rough consensus to disable "limited width" mode by default.
- A link to the user's Special:CentralAuth page will now appear in the subtitle links shown on Special:Contributions. This was voted #17 in the Community Wishlist Survey 2023.
- The Armenia-Azerbaijan 3 case has been closed.
- A case about World War II and the history of Jews in Poland has been opened, with the first evidence phase closing 6 April 2023.
Bebitofiu
Might need a talkpage block; I think I got in just before you blocked them trying to calm their attitude, but they've delightfully decided to respond immaturely. I also make that five or so personal attacks in, like, 20 minutes, FTR. Kingsif (talk) 00:48, 5 April 2023 (UTC)
/64
Hi Zsinj, you may be interested in WP:/64 :) ~ ToBeFree (talk) 22:55, 5 April 2023 (UTC)
- Ha, I am familiar, just sometimes forgetful to go for the /64. Thanks for the reminder! ZsinjTalk 22:56, 5 April 2023 (UTC)
Thanks for adding back the demographic footnotes at Brevard County, Florida. I asked the editor why they were deleting these, but they haven't been back. About 20 articles were messed up. Cheers. Magnolia677 (talk) 09:51, 6 April 2023 (UTC)
- Oof, that’s some cleanup. Looks like each edit needs checked and thankfully the fix is just copying the references back in from the old revision. I watch Brevard County, so it was noticed quickly. Many articles don’t have someone actively working on them. Good catch! ZsinjTalk 10:36, 6 April 2023 (UTC)
- I didn't mean to dump a bunch of work in your lap. I can chip away at it too. Magnolia677 (talk) 13:12, 6 April 2023 (UTC)
- There is WP:NODEADLINE. :-) There is always work to be done! Happy editing, ZsinjTalk 00:01, 7 April 2023 (UTC)
- They have all been corrected. In a couple cases someone else reverted the removals first. ZsinjTalk 00:55, 7 April 2023 (UTC)
- I didn't mean to dump a bunch of work in your lap. I can chip away at it too. Magnolia677 (talk) 13:12, 6 April 2023 (UTC)
User:Balmoral Castle
Would you mind extending the block to indefinite? This user is an LTA - see the history of Bob Stefanowski, for example. — Ingenuity (talk • contribs) 22:46, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
Hello.
In regards to your last message, Blyukher Vasily was not the ,,Red Napoleon". That nickname is actually for another Marshal of the USSR, Mikhail Tuchacevsky. Sebastian Sălătiuan (talk) 18:34, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
- Thank you for letting me know! However, the cited reference verifies the nickname, even if it’s just “foreign media” that gave it to him. If that’s not sufficient, that’s worthy of discussing on the article’s Talk page. ZsinjTalk 18:43, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
Attingham Park
Why have you removed good faith edits i was working on? I hadn't finished and what i was adding was cited and relivant. You provided no explanation and i am confused 62.254.9.173 (talk) 20:01, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
- I'm going to continue to work sincere on the page if that's OK? 62.254.9.173 (talk) 20:11, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
Tulsa race massacre edit warring
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. 2601:547:500:2090:653F:F926:9256:E4D3 (talk) 01:20, 23 April 2023 (UTC)
CS1 error on List of most-streamed songs on Spotify
Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page List of most-streamed songs on Spotify, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
- A "missing periodical" error. References show this error when the name of the magazine or journal is not given. Please edit the article to add the name of the magazine/journal to the reference, or use a different citation template. (Fix | Ask for help)
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 19:46, 23 April 2023 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – May 2023
News and updates for administrators from the past month (April 2023).
|
|
- A request for comment about removing administrative privileges in specified situations is open for feedback.
- Progress has started on the Page Triage improvement project. This is to address the concerns raised by the community in their 2022 WMF letter that requested improvements be made to the tool.
- The proposed decision in the World War II and the history of Jews in Poland case is expected 11 May 2023.
- The Wikimedia Foundation annual plan 2023-2024 draft is open for comment and input through May 19. The final plan will be published in July 2023.
TPA
It looks like 2601:1c2:101:3c80:1140:829c:b4f8:e5e8 needs their TPA revoked. At while you're at it, probably best to expand the block to the WP:/64, see 2601:1c2:101:3c80::/64. Suffusion of Yellow (talk) 23:33, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
Edit-warring on Tulsa race massacre
@Zsinj: Why are you edit-warring to reinsert vandalism that is WP:OR and unsupported by the given references?
- https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Tulsa_race_massacre&diff=prev&oldid=1151274653
- https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Tulsa_race_massacre&diff=prev&oldid=1151274821
- https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Tulsa_race_massacre&diff=prev&oldid=1151276299
How do you explain your actions? 2601:547:500:2090:653F:F926:9256:E4D3 (talk) 01:28, 23 April 2023 (UTC)
- The reversion of obvious vandalism (your removal of sourced content) is an exemption to 3RR. Describing the Tulsa race massacre as right-wing terrorism is supported by the last reference of the paragraph. ZsinjTalk 01:30, 23 April 2023 (UTC)
- @Zsinj: Quote the passage. 2601:547:500:2090:653F:F926:9256:E4D3 (talk) 01:32, 23 April 2023 (UTC)
- I was talking a look at this, expecting to block the IP, but I don't see any mention of right wing in the Guardian source. Did I miss it? ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 01:32, 23 April 2023 (UTC)
- The sticking point is the use of “right wing” within the whole sentence? The sentence has two references and was erroneously removed citing “vandalism” which was incorrect, since content disputes are not vandalism.
- To your question, in the context of this historic event, racial terrorism of blacks in Tulsa was grounded in the hierarchal belief of white supremacy, a right-wing belief. The use of the phrase “right wing” in this sentence is merely a more broad way of describing “racial terrorism”, which can be directly quoted to the article. I interpret the sentence to be using wording that accurately summarizes the source while also enabling the use of another wiki link to a relevant article to provide that context to the reader. The linked article, likewise, mentions that racial terrorism is referred to as “white terrorism” starting as early as the Reconstruction era.
- In conclusion, I defer to consensus on the article’s Talk page or elsewhere. My reason for being involved was the removal content without a valid reason ultimately four times in quick succession. ZsinjTalk 11:28, 23 April 2023 (UTC)
The sentence has two references and was erroneously removed
That is a complete and utter lie. The sentence was not removed.The use of the phrase “right wing” in this sentence is merely a more broad way of describing “racial terrorism”
That is obviously complete bullshit and exposes your far-left WP:POVPUSH. It is also WP:SYNTH.My reason for being involved was the removal content without a valid reason
Vandalism, WP:OR, and WP:SYNTH are all valid reasons for removal. 2601:547:500:2090:DCE6:98CA:DC63:D255 (talk) 23:43, 4 May 2023 (UTC)- I defer to consensus on the article’s Talk page or elsewhere. ZsinjTalk 23:49, 4 May 2023 (UTC)
- What "consensus" are you referring to, exactly? 2601:547:500:2090:DCE6:98CA:DC63:D255 (talk) 23:52, 4 May 2023 (UTC)
- If the inclusion of the words “right wing terrorism” are OR and synthesis, that’s a completely valid argument. I agree, it requires interpretation to justify their inclusion, as I stated above. I wasn’t pushing a POV. I was reverting the removal of content that was apparently referenced but you insisted on adding it back in 3 more times. I don’t own the article, no one does. Wikipedia succeeds through collaboration. Happy editing. ZsinjTalk 00:14, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
I wasn’t pushing a POV.
Your ridiculous and blatantly partisan claimThe use of the phrase “right wing” in this sentence is merely a more broad way of describing “racial terrorism”
proves otherwise. Not to mention that "I interpret" in this context is a huge red flag that any competent and honest admin would be aware of. 2601:547:500:2090:3A:BB2D:A099:4929 (talk) 00:15, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
- If the inclusion of the words “right wing terrorism” are OR and synthesis, that’s a completely valid argument. I agree, it requires interpretation to justify their inclusion, as I stated above. I wasn’t pushing a POV. I was reverting the removal of content that was apparently referenced but you insisted on adding it back in 3 more times. I don’t own the article, no one does. Wikipedia succeeds through collaboration. Happy editing. ZsinjTalk 00:14, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
- What "consensus" are you referring to, exactly? 2601:547:500:2090:DCE6:98CA:DC63:D255 (talk) 23:52, 4 May 2023 (UTC)
- I defer to consensus on the article’s Talk page or elsewhere. ZsinjTalk 23:49, 4 May 2023 (UTC)
- @ScottishFinnishRadish: Since Zsinj has been caught lying about what references say, lying about other users' edits, and engaging in blatantly partisan POV pushing that is WP:OR and WP:SYNTH (see above), what disciplinary action will be taken against Zsinj? Do you let them get away with it because they're a fellow admin? Should admins not be held to a higher standard? Why did you let this transpire without taking any action? 2601:547:500:2090:DCE6:98CA:DC63:D255 (talk) 23:48, 4 May 2023 (UTC)
- Your edits looked like vandalism and were reverted. Rather than going to the talk page and explaining the edit and discussing to achieve consensus you rapidly continued making the same edit. What action did you expect me to take over what is essentially a content dispute when the other editors has already said they'll defer to whatever the consensus is? Also, is it my job to monitor every discussion on this talk page in perpetuity to not let things you disagree with transpire? I'll get right on that when you start paying my mortgage and tending to my livestock. I'm putting up a shed this weekend, too, so I guess you'll take care of that while I watch this talk page?
- In conclusion, no action will be taken because of reverts of what appeared at first blush to be bog standard American politics drive-by vandalism almost two weeks ago. Start a discussion on the talk page, and if there's no obvious consensus or you believe wider input is needed take a look at WP:RFCBEFORE and follow the procedures we have for content disputes. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 00:35, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
- @ScottishFinnishRadish:
is it my job
Are you not an admin? - You did not address the fact that Zsinj lied about what the references said, and about what my edit was.
- You also did not address the fact that they engaged in blatant partisan POV-pushing, claiming that
The use of the phrase “right wing” in this sentence is merely a more broad way of describing “racial terrorism”
. 2601:547:500:2090:3A:BB2D:A099:4929 (talk) 00:13, 10 May 2023 (UTC)- I shared my interpretation of two words within the context of a sentence that isn’t even part of that article anymore. I shared that interpretation here on my user talk page, which is completely fine. I have no further interest in arguing about the content of that article with you. Please stop. ZsinjTalk 01:04, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
- @ScottishFinnishRadish:
I apologize
By reverting your edit i thought i was reverting the vandalism by the IP. i'm a little bit distracted this day. I'm sorry. SimoooIX (talk) 01:22, 12 May 2023 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – June 2023
News and updates for administrators from the past month (May 2023).
|
|
- Following an RfC, editors indefinitely site-banned by community consensus will now have all rights, including sysop, removed.
- As a part of the Wikimedia Foundation's IP Masking project, a new policy has been created that governs the access to temporary account IP addresses. An associated FAQ has been created and individual communities can increase the requirements to view temporary account IP addresses.
- Bot operators and tool maintainers should schedule time in the coming months to test and update their tools for the effects of IP masking. IP masking will not be deployed to any content wiki until at least October 2023 and is unlikely to be deployed to the English Wikipedia until some time in 2024.
- The arbitration case World War II and the history of Jews in Poland has been closed. The topic area of Polish history during World War II (1933-1945) and the history of Jews in Poland is subject to a "reliable source consensus-required" contentious topic restriction.
- Following a community referendum, the arbitration policy has been modified to remove the ability for users to appeal remedies to Jimbo Wales.
Administrators' newsletter – July 2023
News and updates for administrators from the past month (June 2023).
- Contributions to the English Wikipedia are now released under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-SA 4.0) license instead of CC BY-SA 3.0. Contributions are still also released under the GFDL license.
- Discussion is open regarding a proposed global policy regarding third-party resources. Third-party resources are computer resources that reside outside of Wikimedia production websites.
- Two arbitration cases are currently open. Proposed decisions are expected 5 July 2023 for the Scottywong case and 9 July 2023 for the AlisonW case.
Administrators' newsletter – August 2023
News and updates for administrators from the past month (July 2023).
Interface administrator changes
- The tag filter on Special:NewPages and revision history pages can now be inverted. This allows hiding edits made by automated tools. (T334338)
- Special:BlockedExternalDomains is a new tool that allows easier blocking of plain domains (and their subdomains). This is more easily searchable and is faster for the software to use than the existing MediaWiki:Spam-blacklist. It does not support regex (for complex cases), URL path-matching, or the MediaWiki:Spam-whitelist. (T337431)
- The arbitration cases named Scottywong and AlisonW closed 10 July and 16 July respectively.
- The SmallCat dispute arbitration case is in the workshop phase.
Emily Ratajkowski
Hi, and thanks for your help at Emily Ratajkowski. However, I noticed that the semi-protection you put in is significantly shorter than the previous protection, which expired only a short time ago. See the page's protection history. Would you please consider making the semi-protection longer? Thanks. Supernoodler (talk) 20:05, 8 August 2023 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – September 2023
News and updates for administrators from the past month (August 2023).
|
|
- Following an RfC, TFAs will be automatically semi-protected the day before it is on the main page and through the day after.
- A discussion at WP:VPP about revision deletion and oversight for dead names found that
[s]ysops can choose to use revdel if, in their view, it's the right tool for this situation, and they need not default to oversight. But oversight could well be right where there's a particularly high risk to the person. Use your judgment
.
- Special:Contributions now shows the user's local edit count and the account's creation date. (T324166)
- The SmallCat dispute case has closed. As part of the final decision, editors participating in XfD have been reminded to be careful about forming
local consensus which may or may not reflect the broader community consensus
. Regular closers of XfD forums were also encouraged tonote when broader community discussion, or changes to policies and guidelines, would be helpful
.
- Tech tip: The "Browse history interactively" banner shown at the top of Special:Diff can be used to easily look through a history, assemble composite diffs, or find out what archive something wound up in.
CfD nomination at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 October 1 § Category:WikiProject X members
A category or categories you have created have been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2023 October 1 § Category:WikiProject X members on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Qwerfjkltalk 09:31, 2 October 2023 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – January 2024
News and updates for administrators from the past month (December 2023).
- Following the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections, the following editors have been appointed to the Arbitration Committee: Aoidh, Cabayi, Firefly, HJ Mitchell, Maxim, Sdrqaz, ToBeFree, Z1720.
- Following a motion, the Arbitration Committee rescinded the restrictions on the page name move discussions for the two Ireland pages that were enacted in June 2009.
- The arbitration case Industrial agriculture has been closed.
- The New Pages Patrol backlog drive is happening in January 2024 to reduce the backlog of articles in the new pages feed. Currently, there is a backlog of over 13,000 unreviewed articles awaiting review. Sign up here to participate!
Administrators' newsletter – January 2024
News and updates for administrators from the past month (December 2023).
- Following the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections, the following editors have been appointed to the Arbitration Committee: Aoidh, Cabayi, Firefly, HJ Mitchell, Maxim, Sdrqaz, ToBeFree, Z1720.
- Following a motion, the Arbitration Committee rescinded the restrictions on the page name move discussions for the two Ireland pages that were enacted in June 2009.
- The arbitration case Industrial agriculture has been closed.
- The New Pages Patrol backlog drive is happening in January 2024 to reduce the backlog of articles in the new pages feed. Currently, there is a backlog of over 13,000 unreviewed articles awaiting review. Sign up here to participate!
Administrators' newsletter – November 2023
News and updates for administrators from the past month (October 2023).
Interface administrator changes
- The WMF is working on making it possible for administrators to edit MediaWiki configuration directly. This is similar to previous work on Special:EditGrowthConfig. A technical RfC is running until November 08, where you can provide feedback.
- There is a proposed plan for re-enabling the Graph Extension. Feedback on this proposal is requested.
- Eligible editors are invited to self-nominate themselves from 12 November 2023 until 21 November 2023 to stand in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections.
- Xaosflux, RoySmith and Cyberpower678 have been appointed to the Electoral Commission for the 2023 Arbitration Committee Elections. BusterD is the reserve commissioner.
- Following a motion, the contentious topic designation of Prem Rawat has been struck. Actions previously taken using this contentious topic designation are still in force.
- Following several motions, multiple topic areas are no longer designated as a contentious topic. These contentious topic designations were from the Editor conduct in e-cigs articles, Liancourt Rocks, Longevity, Medicine, September 11 conspiracy theories, and Shakespeare authorship question cases.
- Following a motion, remedies 3.1 (All related articles under 1RR whenever the dispute over naming is concerned), 6 (Stalemate resolution) and 30 (Administrative supervision) of the Macedonia 2 case have been rescinded.
- Following a motion, remedy 6 (One-revert rule) of the The Troubles case has been amended.
- An arbitration case named Industrial agriculture has been opened. Evidence submissions in this case close 8 November.
- The Articles for Creation backlog drive is happening in November 2023, with 700+ drafts pending reviews for in the last 4 months or so. In addition to the AfC participants, all administrators and New Page Patrollers can conduct reviews using the helper script, Yet Another AFC Helper Script, which can be enabled in the Gadgets settings. Sign up here to participate!
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – December 2023
News and updates for administrators from the past month (November 2023).
- Following a talk page discussion, the Administrators' accountability policy has been updated to note that while it is considered best practice for administrators to have notifications (pings) enabled, this is not mandatory. Administrators who do not use notifications are now strongly encouraged to indicate this on their user page.
- Following a motion, the Extended Confirmed Restriction has been amended, removing the allowance for non-extended-confirmed editors to post constructive comments on the "Talk:" namespace. Now, non-extended-confirmed editors may use the "Talk:" namespace solely to make edit requests related to articles within the topic area, provided that their actions are not disruptive.
- The Arbitration Committee has announced a call for Checkusers and Oversighters, stating that it will currently be accepting applications for CheckUser and/or Oversight permissions at any point in the year.
- Eligible users are invited to vote on candidates for the Arbitration Committee until 23:59 December 11, 2023 (UTC). Candidate statements can be seen here.
What does the warned user thing mean?
I saw a notification on Wikipedia:Administrator_intervention_against_vandalism. I don't have to do anything for this, correct? It doesn't seem like I do, but I want to be sure. Feeglgeef (talk) 03:42, 29 December 2023 (UTC)
- I added a note that you already warned the user, so fellow admins could be aware of the status of that report. Thanks for warning vandals! Happy editing and New Year. ZsinjTalk 13:07, 29 December 2023 (UTC)
CV RevDel at Perry High School shooting
Hi Zsinj, thanks for working the copyvio revdel here, however this revision still needs to be revdel'd. I thought I updated the diffs to include it, but I might have missed it. ––FormalDude (talk) 03:27, 5 January 2024 (UTC)
- Looks like I accidentally edited over your update of the diffs, oops! Thanks for pointing out the additional oldid. It’s done! ZsinjTalk 03:31, 5 January 2024 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – February 2024
News and updates for administrators from the past month (January 2024).
- An RfC about increasing the inactivity requirement for Interface administrators is open for feedback.
- Pages that use the JSON contentmodel will now use tabs instead of spaces for auto-indentation. This will significantly reduce the page size. (T326065)
- Following a motion, the Arbitration Committee adopted a new enforcement restriction on January 4, 2024, wherein the Committee may apply the 'Reliable source consensus-required restriction' to specified topic areas.
- Community feedback is requested for a draft to replace the "Information for administrators processing requests" section at WP:AE.
- Voting in the 2024 Steward elections will begin on 06 February 2024, 14:00 (UTC) and end on 27 February 2024, 14:00 (UTC). The confirmation process of current stewards is being held in parallel. You can automatically check your eligibility to vote.
- A vote to ratify the charter for the Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) is open till 2 February 2024, 23:59:59 (UTC) via Secure Poll. All eligible voters within the Wikimedia community have the opportunity to either support or oppose the adoption of the U4C Charter and share their reasons. The details of the voting process and voter eligibility can be found here.
- Community Tech has made some preliminary decisions about the future of the Community Wishlist Survey. In summary, they aim to develop a new, continuous intake system for community technical requests that improves prioritization, resource allocation, and communication regarding wishes. Read more
- The Unreferenced articles backlog drive is happening in February 2024 to reduce the backlog of articles tagged with {{Unreferenced}}. You can help reduce the backlog by adding citations to these articles. Sign up to participate!
January 2024 NPP backlog drive – Points award
The Working Man's Barnstar | |
This award is given in recognition to Zsinj for collecting at least 10 points during the January 2024 NPP backlog drive. Your contributions played a part in the 16,070 reviews completed during the drive. Thank you so much for taking part and contributing to help reduce the backlog! Hey man im josh (talk) 22:45, 8 February 2024 (UTC) |
Richard dawkins page
I dont know how to do citations but I could tell you where i got them from so you can do it on my behalf and would kindly reinstate my additions. He said he has voted lib dem "all his life" in a poetry of reality video called "is religion inevitable". He said he only drinks alcohol with food early on in the video with bill maher on the club random podcast. The earliest record of the word designoid is from dawkins' christmas lecture, "is the universe designed" on his poetry of reality podcast video. So he did coin the word atleast rather than popularise it. If you search the word on the Internet only dawkins is referenced. It is shown and stated he enjoys music in the youtube video called "freethought matters - richard dawkins". I cant remember where he said that a female doctor who is a loss of a role model for boys but he did for certain. It might of been in an old tweet in 2017. In a more recent tweet last year he tweets he watches cricket. Robinhoodph (talk) 18:26, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
- Hi! It’s not a big deal. Here is a helpful page to introduce you to citing references on Wikipedia: Help:Referencing for beginners. Happy editing! ZsinjTalk 18:29, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks Robinhoodph (talk) 18:52, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – March 2024
News and updates for administrators from the past month (February 2024).
|
|
- Phase I of the 2024 RfA review is now open for participation. Editors are invited to review, comment on, and propose improvements to the requests for adminship process.
- Following an RfC, the inactivity requirement for the removal of the interface administrator right increased from 6 months to 12 months.
- The mobile site history pages now use the same HTML as the desktop history pages. (T353388)
- The 2024 appointees for the Ombuds commission are だ*ぜ, AGK, Ameisenigel, Bennylin, Daniuu, Doǵu, Emufarmers, Faendalimas, MdsShakil, Minorax, Nehaoua, Renvoy and RoySmith as members, with Vermont serving as steward-observer.
- Following the 2024 Steward Elections, the following editors have been appointed as stewards: Ajraddatz, Albertoleoncio, EPIC, JJMC89, Johannnes89, Melos and Yahya.
Administrators' newsletter – April 2024
News and updates for administrators from the past month (March 2024).
- An RfC is open to convert all current and future community discretionary sanctions to (community designated) contentious topics procedure.
- The Toolforge Grid Engine services have been shut down after the final migration process from Grid Engine to Kubernetes. (T313405)
- An arbitration case has been opened to look into "the intersection of managing conflict of interest editing with the harassment (outing) policy".
- Editors are invited to sign up for The Core Contest, an initiative running from April 15 to May 31, which aims to improve vital and other core articles on Wikipedia.