Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/ACBot

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. The result of the discussion was Denied.

ACBot[edit]

Operator: ACBest

Automatic or Manually Assisted: Manually Assisted

Programming Language(s): AWB

Function Summary: Just to do short stuff, minor edits, such as spelling

Edit period(s) (e.g. Continuous, daily, one time run):Every day at about 4pm, weekends a little earlier.

Edit rate requested: 10 edits per minute

Already has a bot flag (Y/N):

Function Details: It will do little things, like help me with mis spellings on my pages. Help me check for typos on other articles, place templates, such as the wikiproject trains one, theres a lot of places needing that!

Discussion[edit]

Just so you know, automatic spellcheckers aare frequently denied - Unless you are watching that part or using a very strict system, I wouldn't recommend it. Matt - TheFearow 21:38, 31 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Don't worry, i will be watching that. ACBestMy ContributionsAutograph Book 06:36, 1 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Besides, it will only be used in your personal userspace right? E talk 13:03, 1 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
no, i am going to use it with wikiproject trains uk, or what ever its called, with agreement from them that is - theres a lot of pages without the template {{WikiProject Trains}} ACBestMy ContributionsAutograph Book 16:48, 1 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

We need a specific function or functions detailed, as is this request is too vague for me to understand what you want to do. --ST47Talk 18:06, 1 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It will help me on my userpage, it will help WikiProject UK Railways with agreement from them, it may do a bit of spell checking, and when it's not doing any of that, it will just do little other things. ACBestMy ContributionsAutograph Book 06:50, 2 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Fair enough, you said it would help you, help the wikiproject, but what other little things would it do? What do you mean by little things, and can you provide some examples? It is preferred if we know exactly what the bot will do. Stwalkerster talk review 08:15, 2 June 2007 (UTC)User_talk:MaxSem&curid=3376525&diff=135271977&oldid=135271699[reply]

Note: ACBest (talk • contribs • non-automated contribs • wikichecker • count • total • logs • page moves • block log • email) lacks 500 mainspace edits typically required for approval to use AWB. MaxSem 08:26, 2 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Max. On those grounds, I would be hesitant to presume that you have the requisite policy and "wiki-etiquette" knowledge to do some of the tasks you suggest above. Typo fixing can never, ever be done in automatic mode, and I wouldn't really like to see it done on any bot account, as typo fixes, manually approved or not, should be linkable to a user to demonstrate that they *have* undergone manual checking. WikiProject tagging as another kettle of fish. Due to significant problems with WikiProject tagging within the community, we are extremely hesitant to approve any bot to do this sort of task. Before the community attitude became clear, we approval about half a dozen bots to do jobs like this, and that approval still stands. If the WikiProject does indeed want articles tagging, they should make a request at Wikipedia:BOTREQ, and someone with approval will see it and do it.
Bot requests for approval need to state a specific task, and each individual task must be judged, and approved, on its own merits. Bot approval does not entitle the bot to do any task other than that which it was specifically approved for, and we need to carefully examine each and every task, with input from the community on all. I'm going to ask you to list each specific task you would like to perform, and we can judge each on its own merits. The experience issue still stands, and I for one (as an AWB dev, not in my capacity as a BAG member) have serious reservations regarding giving bot access to someone who fails to meet the requirements for standard user access. Martinp23 12:14, 2 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Spelling bots tend to be full of errors and often the tiny edits are not worth making thousands of. Even if it does some other cleanup while at it, I am not confident in any spell checking bot atm. Voice-of-All 18:20, 2 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
You could use AWB under your own account in your userspace but you would obviously still have to approve those edits manually and follow the instructions on the AWB Checkpage to get permission to use AWB. Please note that, typically, at least 500 mainspace edits are required for approval. -- Seed 2.0 09:55, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Does that mean if i get 500 mainspace edits, i can use AWB under my bot account? ACBestMy ContributionsAutograph Book 10:04, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Hello? Anyway, i thought of another idea; until i get AWB, i will operate it totally manually? ACBestMy ContributionsAutograph Book 19:35, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
AWB usually requires the operating user to have over 500 mainspace edits to be accepted to the checklist. If you are accepted to use AWB, you can only use it manually by your own account, not the bot. When you have been accepted for the bot approval you may then request for AWB on your bot account and then use it for the sole purpose stated in your BRFA. Remember, no bot should run without a flag and prior approval by a BAG member. Hope that explains it for you. E talk 07:23, 7 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Whats a bot flag? ACBestMy ContributionsAutograph Book 07:47, 7 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
It's a technical permission that can be given to a user that prevents their edits showing up on Recent Changes, allows their edits to be hidden from watchlists, and allows them to edit user talk pages without causing a new-messages prompt (the bot can still cause a new-messages prompt if it wishes by marking the edit as non-minor). Contrary to what E suggests, not all bots have a bot flag (AntiVandalBot is one example of a high-profile unflagged bot), although all should have approval. The flag is usually given to maintenance bots that make uninteresting edits at a high rate, but not to bots where other people noticing the edits is a good thing. --ais523 13:59, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
OK, so mine wont really need a flag. Anyway, since weve come to the agreements that it will be used on my userspace only, when will it be approved? ACBestMy ContributionsAutograph Book 15:43, 7 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
If it's only going to be used for your personal userspace, I reckon it will be alright. It's now up to the Bot Approvals Group to make a decision. E talk 06:33, 8 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
OK, so let me get this straight - the bot gets approved hopefully, then can i go ask AWB if i can have it for my bot - right? ACBestMy ContributionsAutograph Book 10:59, 8 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Just to make this perfectly clear in the interest of avoiding misunderstandings: having approval to run a bot does not exempt you from the requirement to get permission to run AWB. The rationale behind this being that AWB is a powerful tool that should only be used by experienced editors (experience implies knowledge and understanding of policy) who have a specific need for it.
The point is not to make sure that only a select few can use AWB - instead, think of it more like a commercial driver's license: driving a big truck isn't glorious work but it's still something that requires a commercial driver's license (well, in the United States, at least) because a certain amount of experience is required to operate such a vehicle without hurting anyone or damaging anything. AWB is very much like that: very useful (like a truck, even if not as useful as a series of tubes ;) but there's the potential for collateral damage if operated by someone who isn't that experienced. That's why we have the requirement. Another thing: if you only intend to use AWB in your own userspace, you don't really need a bot flag or AWB's bot mode. There are only a handful of pages in most people's userspace and you should manually review all changes made by the bot anyway unless you're confident that they can be done unsupervised. That's why it's likely that you couldn't really make full use of AWB's bot mode (at this time, for example, you only have 34 pages in your user space). Please also note that AWB works exactly the same in manual mode. Personally, I would suggest that you withdraw this request, wait until you meet the eligibility requirement for AWB (at the moment, you have 245 mainspace edits) and then use AWB under your own account (in manual mode, of course). -- Seed 2.0 09:01, 9 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you want bot approval to "help in your userspace", you are barking up the wrong tree, I'm afraid. If you don't have >=500 mainspace edits, you will not be approved to use AWB, nor will your bot (speaking here from my role as an AWB dev). That said, I'm going to have to reject this request, as it is a procedural impossibility for you to be approved. Thanks, Martinp23 11:55, 9 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Denied. Martinp23 11:55, 9 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Bots/Requests_for_approval/ACBot&oldid=1146390859"