Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/DannyS712 bot 42

The following discussion is an archived debate. Please do not modify it. To request review of this BRFA, please start a new section at WT:BRFA. The result of the discussion was  Approved.

DannyS712 bot 42

• (BRFA
• Approved BRFAs
• talk
• contribs
• count
• SUL
• logs
• page moves
• block log
• rights log
• flag)

Operator: DannyS712 (talk · contribs · SUL · edit count · logs · page moves · block log · rights log · ANI search)

Time filed: 23:21, Monday, May 27, 2019 (UTC)

Automatic, Supervised, or Manual: automatic

Programming language(s): AWB

Source code available: AWB

Function overview: Assess unassessed articles that are part of Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa and are tagged as stubs as stub class

Links to relevant discussions (where appropriate): Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Africa#Unassessed articles tagged as stubs

Edit period(s): One time run

Estimated number of pages affected: 5800

Exclusion compliant (Yes/No): No

Already has a bot flag (Yes/No): Yes

Function details: This is a follow-up to Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/DannyS712 bot 21, which suggested that a more limited scale would be ideal, and a follow up to Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/DannyS712 bot 35 and Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/DannyS712 bot 41, which were approved to do the same for wikiproject SCOTUS and wikiproject Architecture, showing that the logic of the bot is sound.

Discussion

• @Indy beetle: BRFA filed! --DannyS712 (talk) 23:21, 27 May 2019 (UTC)

Approved for trial (50 edits). Please provide a link to the relevant contributions and/or diffs when the trial is complete.. — xaosflux ^Talk 00:08, 28 May 2019 (UTC)

@Xaosflux: Trial complete. [1] - didn't see any issues. I'm using a different regex because of the number of task forces that have parameters for {{WikiProject Africa}}, but I didn't see any errors with the new regex. --DannyS712 (talk) 00:23, 28 May 2019 (UTC)

 Approved. task approved. — xaosflux ^Talk 15:17, 28 May 2019 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. To request review of this BRFA, please start a new section at WT:BRFA.