Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/DschwenBot (2)

The following discussion is an archived debate. Please do not modify it. To request review of this BRFA, please start a new section at WT:BRFA. The result of the discussion was Withdrawn by operator.

DschwenBot (2)

• (BRFA
• Approved BRFAs
• talk
• contribs
• count
• SUL
• logs
• page moves
• block log
• rights log
• flag)

Operator: Dschwen (talk · contribs · SUL · edit count · logs · page moves · block log · rights log · ANI search)

Time filed: 21:26, Monday August 26, 2013 (UTC)

Automatic, Supervised, or Manual: automatic (with initial supervision)

Programming language(s): python (pywikipediabot,mwparserfromhell)

Source code available: will be made available

Function overview: Processes monument lists for Wikipedia Loves Monuments and adds geo coordinates if the monument has a geocoded Wikipedia article. Example.

Links to relevant discussions (where appropriate):

Edit period(s): one time batch processing of all WLM lists

Estimated number of pages affected: a few hundred

Exclusion compliant (Yes/No): Yes (pywikipediabot obeys this by default)

Already has a bot flag (Yes/No): No

Function details: Adds lat/lon parameters to Monument Row templates on WLM monument list pages. Coordinates are fetched from User:Dispensers GHEL coordinate database. Existing coordinates are not overwritten.

Discussion

•  Note: This bot appears to have edited since this BRFA was filed. Bots may not edit outside their own or their operator's userspace unless approved or approved for trial. AnomieBOT⚡ 21:35, 26 August 2013 (UTC)
  • Tattletale!! --Dschwen 21:57, 26 August 2013 (UTC)
    • Just a minor request: Please add two newlines in the edit to keep every parameter on one line, makes it easier to read and edit. Multichill (talk) 18:17, 27 August 2013 (UTC)
      • Newlines added and the bug where empty lat/lon parameters are kept in addition to the new lat/lon parameters is fixed as well. --Dschwen 04:30, 28 August 2013 (UTC)
        • Awesome! Can you do some more test edits? Multichill (talk) 17:29, 28 August 2013 (UTC)
          • Here: [1], [2], and [3]. --Dschwen 22:17, 28 August 2013 (UTC)

{{BAGAssistanceNeeded}} BAG, can we action this since there was a snafu in the approval on this? Hasteur (talk) 01:10, 21 September 2013 (UTC)

Approved for trial (30 edits). Please provide a link to the relevant contributions and/or diffs when the trial is complete. —  HELLKNOWZ  ▎TALK 16:52, 21 September 2013 (UTC)

A user has requested the attention of the operator. Once the operator has seen this message and replied, please deactivate this tag. (user notified) This has been approved for trial for six weeks, and no edits have occurred. What's going on? Josh Parris 11:04, 5 November 2013 (UTC)

Per the user Withdrawn by operator. Josh Parris 08:42, 11 November 2013 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. To request review of this BRFA, please start a new section at WT:BRFA.