Wikipedia:Featured and good topic removal candidates/Thatgamecompany/archive1
Thatgamecompany[edit]
7 articles
The retention period for Journey ended on June 13, and still remains far from being at least a GA, thus the topic fails criteria 3(a). The primary contributor of the topic, PresN, was contacted by another editor over two weeks ago about the topic's impending retention date, but PresN hasn't edited Journey since March 31, and no other editor is actively attempting to improve the article.--十八 08:06, 22 June 2012 (UTC)
- Not disagreeing about it not being a GA. From what I can tell, it immediately needs more on its Reception, and the bare URL cites into proper refs. Other problems may come up in GAN if those can be fixed. I can't promise anything but I will try to do my part on this to correct, but it is correctable and not an insurmountable thing to get past. --MASEM (t) 12:41, 22 June 2012 (UTC)
- Yeah, this is my bad, I've been very inactive on WP for the past 2+ months and I haven't even played the game yet. It's the top of my list, though, so I'll start on this this weekend. --PresN 05:31, 23 June 2012 (UTC)
- I note that, as one of the game's versions won't even be released until August, there are good grounds for allowing the three month grace period to start then, meaning that this shouldn't be delisted until August. In any case, as PresN is now working on the article, and I'd be happy to review it once it's up at GAC (as I have reviewed several of the others). J Milburn (talk) 13:47, 4 July 2012 (UTC)
- Then a speedy keep for filling the criteria would be good. igordebraga ≠ 19:20, 28 July 2012 (UTC)
- Speedy Keep, as per above. Good work fixin' it!--Gen. Quon (Talk) 22:46, 29 July 2012 (UTC)
- Closed with consensus to keep. TBrandley 22:58, 29 July 2012 (UTC)