Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Chinese nationality law/archive1

The following is an archived discussion of a featured article nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured article candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The article was archived by Laser brain via FACBot (talk) 13 October 2020 [1].

Chinese nationality law[edit]

Nominator(s): Horserice (talk) 05:03, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This article is about Chinese nationality law. The framework for a lot of these regulations was created in the waning years of the Qing dynasty, through which we can take a peek into the monarchy's views on the rest of the world at that time. This article just passed GA review and I think it's ready to be reviewed here. Horserice (talk) 05:03, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Image review—pass

Only image looks OK for copyright (t · c) buidhe 18:11, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment

The article is very short for a FA, only 1939 words of readable prose. I am surprised that there is not more to say about this topic. (t · c) buidhe 18:15, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Had to do a bit of reading before getting back to this. The basic principles of the law have barely changed in the last century and I think what has been changed is already covered here quite succinctly, so I'd have to ask what you'd like to see added? Horserice (talk) 04:36, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The article lead does not properly summarize the article. This is the most important part of an article and I wonder why this was not at least mentioned as a topic for improvement in the GA review. Hekerui (talk) 21:14, 4 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Coordinator comment - This has dropped into the Older Nominations section without any support for promotion or substantial prose review. Therefore, I will be archiving it shortly and it may be re-nominated after the customary two-week waiting period. --Laser brain (talk) 13:54, 13 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Closing note: This candidate has been archived, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FAC/ar, and leave the {{featured article candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through. --Laser brain (talk) 13:54, 13 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.