Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Pearl Jam/archive1

a great accurate article that should be a featured article 0111 03:18, 21 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Object. Needs more references and a longer intro. A "critical reaction" section might not be a bad idea. Stilgar135 04:04, 21 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Object ditto to stilgar -Ravedave 05:16, 21 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Object Only 7 cited references, including 2 from AMG and 1 from Sony Music. Woefully inadequate. Pearl Jam are famous enough - nay legendary - to have been mentioned in print thousands of times. Get some books from the library. Search the newspaper archives. --kingboyk 12:38, 22 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Object agree with comment above SOADLuver 20:01, 22 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support with only 7 refrences this sure is a great article0111 21:49, 23 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Object per Kingboyk - La Pizza11 16:10, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Object Lacks sufficient inline citations, and also doesn't have a cultural impact / critical reaction section. LuciferMorgan 23:27, 26 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]