Wikipedia:Featured article removal candidates/Parthenon
Parthenon[edit]
- Article is still a featured article.
No sources, only external links. [[User:Neutrality|Neutrality/talk]] 00:26, Dec 21, 2004 (UTC)
- Oppose removal. Author's credibility makes up for lack of sources. Fredrik | talk 00:56, 21 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- Oppose removal. Excellent article, lack of sources are not a reason to remove from featured articles, and also what Frederik said. Ambi 01:28, 21 Dec 2004 (UTC)
- It certainly could be a reason to remove them. Just depends on what we want. No article should pass now without them, so why should articles be allowed to stay without them? I think references are important enough. See Talk:Art in Ancient Greece#Lack of References. One writer or reference would be unacceptable for any serious academic work, so why shouldn't we strive to exceed that minimum ideal here? - Taxman 02:24, Dec 21, 2004 (UTC)
- Oppose removal Filiocht 08:57, 21 Dec, 2004 (UTC)