Wikipedia:Featured article review/Ike Altgens/archive1

The following is an archived discussion of a featured article review. Please do not modify it. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page or at Wikipedia talk:Featured article review. No further edits should be made to this page.

The article was removed by Dana boomer 16:44, 3 August 2010 [1].

---

Ike Altgens

Review commentary

Ike Altgens (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

• Featured article candidates/Ike Altgens
• Featured article candidates/Ike Altgens/archive1
• Featured article candidates/Ike Altgens/archive2

• Featured article review/Ike Altgens/archive1

Notified: All listed WikiProjects. Author has been retired for three years.

The article has many unsourced parts, including quotations and conjectures regarding JFK's assassinations. It also uses many non-high-quality non-RSs, such as the last cite, and those to a German hobbyist (#6) No textbooks or scholarly works are used when many are available. Spartacus is not a reliable source. YellowMonkey (vote in the Southern Stars and White Ferns supermodel photo poll) 03:32, 7 July 2010 (UTC)

FARC commentary

Featured article criterion of concern are sourcing YellowMonkey (vote in the Southern Stars and White Ferns supermodel photo poll) 03:58, 20 July 2010 (UTC)

• Delist per self YellowMonkey (vote in the Southern Stars and White Ferns supermodel photo poll) 03:58, 20 July 2010 (UTC)

• Delist per criterion three:
  • File:Altgens1.jpg - Not low resolution (NFCC#3B), no rationale (NFCC#10C).
  • File:Altgens.jpg - No attribution of author/copyright holder (NFCC#10A), no rationale.
  • File:Altgens2.jpg - No rationale. If File:Altgens1.jpg is the defining photo (I note use of the singular in "arguably the most famous photograph"), what is the significant contribution to our understanding of Altgens (NFCC#8)? This is not the article on the JFK assassination...
  • File:Altgens blowup.jpg - No rationale. Redundant to File:Altgens1.jpg (NFCC#3A). If discerning this level of detail is actually important to a reader's understanding of Altgens (doubtful - NFCC#8), then that may be an argument to retain the high resolution in Altgens1.jpg, but there's currently no articulated need for a second use. Эlcobbola _talk 17:41, 26 July 2010 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.