Wikipedia:Featured article review/Lord's Resistance Army insurgency/archive1

The following is an archived discussion of a featured article review. Please do not modify it. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page or at Wikipedia talk:Featured article review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The article was removed by YellowAssessmentMonkey 02:24, 27 July 2009 [1].

---

Lord's Resistance Army insurgency

Review commentary

Notified: Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Military history, Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Military history/African military history task force, Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Terrorism, Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Africa, User talk:BanyanTree, User talk:Ezeu, User talk:TreveX.

FA from 2005, referencing/1c issues throughout. Appears to have been some move issues as raised here. Also concern about small subsections and lack of comprehensiveness about the topic. Cirt (talk) 00:46, 26 June 2009 (UTC)

• Quick comments
  • Lead seems short.
  • Many sentences are unreferenced.
  • References" should be under "notes" per WP:LAYOUT.
  • Many of the newspaper articles are incorrectly formatted.
  • Regarding comprehensiveness: although I am not one to judge, as I know nothing about this, it seems to be a little short to adequately cover what is rightfully a controversial topic. —Ed (Talk • Contribs) 03:07, 26 June 2009 (UTC)

• Note Talk:Lord's Resistance Army#Merger proposal. I know of two people on Wikipedia who have the background to comprehensively upgrade the article: Ezeu and myself. I'm burnt out after five years of dealing with editors whose sole interest is itemizing how Christian or Muslim the LRA is, and Ezeu's March proposal to upgrade it was shot down by the editors who moved/split it. In my opinion, there's no need to drag this out for two weeks. Might as well stick a fork in it. - BanyanTree 08:24, 26 June 2009 (UTC)

• Images check OK. DrKiernan (talk) 13:51, 3 July 2009 (UTC)

FARC commentary

Suggested FA criteria concern are citations, layout/formatting, POV. Also note the recent change to WP:WIAFA (1c) requiring "high-quality" sources. FAQ? YellowMonkey (cricket calendar poll!) paid editing=POV 14:23, 7 July 2009 (UTC)

• Delist, per FA criteria concerns. Cirt (talk) 20:46, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
• Delist Per concerns raised by Cirt, BanyanTree, and the ed17. Dabomb87 (talk) 17:01, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
• Delist per above, with apologies to BanyanTree. —Ed (Talk • Contribs) 02:48, 16 July 2009 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.