Wikipedia:Featured article review/Palace of Westminster/archive1

The following is an archived discussion of a featured article review. Please do not modify it. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page or at Wikipedia talk:Featured article review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The article was removed 21:17, 4 January 2008.

Palace of Westminster[edit]

Review commentary[edit]

Notified WP England, WP Architecture, and Lord Emsworth

This article, a 2005 promotion, lacks in-line citations (1c), and as a result contains some weasel words, such as this line: Probably the most famous attempt. Who says this? hbdragon88 (talk) 19:36, 23 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Who says The Gunpowder Plot is the most famous attempt to break omtp the Palace of Palace of Westminster? Almost everybody; the only possible comparison I can see is the attempted arrest of the Five Members. Septentrionalis PMAnderson 03:51, 30 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
MOS breaches all over the place. Trivial chronological items are linked.Tony (talk) 09:57, 8 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

FARC commentary[edit]

Suggested FA criteria concerns are referencing (1c) and weasel words. Joelito (talk) 12:32, 15 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Remove per 1c. LuciferMorgan (talk) 11:08, 16 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Please specify what claims are challenged, or likely to be challenged, and not trivially findable, especially in the three factsheets from the House of Commons listed in the references. Then this process can be an actual improvement to the encyclopedia, instead of taking away a brass star from Emsworth, who isn't here to miss it. Septentrionalis PMAnderson 20:16, 19 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Remove per nom - no work done. --Peter Andersen (talk) 14:30, 31 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured article review. No further edits should be made to this page.