Wikipedia:Featured article review/Yagan/archive1

The following is an archived discussion of a featured article review. Please do not modify it. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page or at Wikipedia talk:Featured article review. No further edits should be made to this page.

The article was delisted by Nikkimaria via FACBot (talk) 1:05, 6 February 2021 (UTC) [1].

---

Yagan

Notified: Hesperain, WP Bio, WP Australia, talk page notice 2020-12-04

Review section

I raised concerns about this 2006 FA over a month ago on talk, and there has been no reaction. See talk page notice 2020-12-04 Concerns are lead, comprehensiveness, balance, and some MOS cleanup. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 02:55, 10 January 2021 (UTC)

• Delist has significant POV issues that will require extensive cleanup and past experience shows that even minor changes to the article will only occur with significant discussion in to finite details due to the nature of the subject including the fact that a lot of the sourcing itself comes from colonial bias sources and more recent sourcing published during the History Wars era where. The article also presents Yagan's and Nyungar culture as part of a monocultural group of Aboriginals Australians rather than taking into account that Nyungar and Whadjuk Nyungar people had their own laws, culture, language, and customs which they shared with other Nyungar states comprising the southwest of what is now Western Australia. Gnangarra 01:30, 15 January 2021 (UTC)

  Gnangarra see FAR instructions, Keep or Delist are not declared during the FAR phase. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 19:07, 15 January 2021 (UTC)

  Take the section lobbying for repatriation it says " Tribal elders entrusted the Aboriginal leader Ken Colbung with the search." there are no tribal elders. Nyungar culture refers to Elders as people of experience and wisdom the use of tribe is a European anthropological construct. The page erroneously refers to tribe, tribes, or tribal on 19 separate occasions. Gnangarra 10:03, 16 January 2021 (UTC)

• Move to FARC since FAR listing, minor copyedits only, significant issues unaddressed. [2] SandyGeorgia (Talk) 05:22, 23 January 2021 (UTC)

FARC section

Issues raised in the review section include comprehensiveness and neutrality. Nikkimaria (talk) 21:18, 23 January 2021 (UTC)

• Delist would need significant work to bring the article to meet the FA criteria. (t · c) buidhe 10:02, 26 January 2021 (UTC)
• Delist issues unaddressed, SandyGeorgia (Talk) 16:25, 2 February 2021 (UTC)
• Delist as per what others have mentioned. Deltawk (talk) 02:12, 3 February 2021 (UTC)
• Closing note: This removal candidate has been delisted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please leave the {{featured article review}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through. Nikkimaria (talk) 21:05, 6 February 2021 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.