Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Daytime Emmy Award for Outstanding Supporting Actor in a Drama Series/archive1
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The list was promoted by Giants2008 10:01, 26 August 2013 (UTC) [1].[reply]
Daytime Emmy Award for Outstanding Supporting Actor in a Drama Series[edit]
Daytime Emmy Award for Outstanding Supporting Actor in a Drama Series (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Toolbox |
---|
I am nominating this for featured list because I believe that it meets the every single criteria. Also, I believe it to be well sourced and clear. After much tweaking and further adjustments I feel that it is worthy of being a Featured List. I believe this list is worthy, considering I worked on it with the Featured lists, Daytime Emmy Award for Outstanding Younger Actress in a Drama Series, Daytime Emmy Award for Outstanding Younger Actor in a Drama Series, Daytime Emmy Award for Outstanding Supporting Actress in a Drama Series and Daytime Emmy Award for Outstanding Lead Actress in a Drama Series in mind. If you oppose, please address your issues here so they can be resolved. — SoapFan12 Talk 11:40, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Comments
- In the lead, I'm concerned because you've quoted the award's description, but this is not in the source presented. Nor does anything in the source given support information in this quote (though it does support the award first being presented in 1979, just nothing else). WP:OR.
- I am sorry but I can not find a source to support the description since the Daytime Emmys have way low profile than the Primetime Emmys (I have searched for hours)...IMO, it should be left alone since the other Daytime Emmy categories, this issue has not been brought up. Also, the other thing I could tell you is that on the website of the daytime emmys, it says that ″The Daytime Emmy Award are honoring excellence in all fields of daytime″ but it says nothing about the description of a specific categorie. — SoapFan12 Talk 13:46, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- It's fine. What you have done is acceptable. As long as you aren't making up quotes, I don't see any further issues. Arre 14:45, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Fix up ref 12
- The caption for the Billy Miller image is very awkwardly worded, try rewording.
- If you're writing the year pictured for the caption beneath the images (e.g. Josh Duhamel) make all of them that way.
- The captions for the images are inconsistent (in terms of wording, adding years, etc). Not a huge problem, but go through them once more.
- I know the WP:OVERLINK issue has been brought up before, but is there a need to link titles multiple times on the winners/nominees table, while nothing is linked on the other tables?
- It has been decided that, it should be left alone in the previous FLC since the reviewer thought it was WP:UNDERLINK, but everyone agree it was not since everything is link in the main table. Also, I was told that only sortable, allows WP:OVERLINK and I did that but it cause way more problems so it has been decided that it was resolved. — SoapFan12 Talk 13:51, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Comments
- Billy Miller caption still a little unclear, try "Billy Miller was nominated three times, winning in 2010 and 2013 for his role.."
- Series with most awards section doesn't need to link to series again. WP:Overlink
- Never mind, it has already been fixed.
- Putting "(tie)" in 2007 and 2013 is probably unneeded since it is already explained in the lead, and is pretty self-explanatory.
- Not sure about this one, but it looks to me that the ampersand in the infobox doesn't need to be bolded. I'd check with the mos for that.
- The 'awarded for' in the infobox could use another word, such as "most outstanding..." to clarify. Also I don't all the words need to be capitalized in that sentence.
- Done. Also, It looks better when everything is capatilized. I think it should be left alone since it was never brought up in the previous FLC nominations. — SoapFan12 Talk 17:55, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Okay that's fine.
Just those little things, and I'd be happy to support.Caringtype1 (talk) 17:29, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Support per the above reasoning.Caringtype1 (talk) 18:05, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Support: The years in the "Winners and nominees" table needs to be closed though. – Underneath-it-All (talk) 03:45, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]