Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Latin Grammy Award for Best Short Form Music Video/archive1

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by Giants2008 03:07, 15 December 2012 [1].

Latin Grammy Award for Best Short Form Music Video[edit]

Latin Grammy Award for Best Short Form Music Video (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Toolbox
Nominator(s): Jaespinoza (talk) 02:29, 15 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I am nominating this for featured list because because I think it is spelled correctly and is based on references checked in detail; this list is part of the Latin Grammy Project to elevate all categories to FL status. I will be watching closely the comments of the reviewers, appreciating your interest in improving the list. Thanks. Jaespinoza (talk) 02:29, 15 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Resolved comments from Erick (talk) 15:25, 18 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
*Comment Very good work. Here are some fixings that needs to be on the references:
FN 10, publisher should be Time Inc.
Fixed. Jaespinoza (talk) 06:24, 18 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
FN 3, work should be ABC News and publisher is American Broadcasting Company.
Fixed. Jaespinoza (talk) 06:24, 18 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
FN 16, work should be ABC (newspaper) and publisher is Grupo Vocento.
Fixed. Jaespinoza (talk) 06:24, 18 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Avoid WP:OVERLINK. For example, only the first instance of Los Angeles Times and Tribune Company needs to be linked. Erick (talk) 23:36, 16 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Fixed. Thanks Erick! Jaespinoza (talk) 06:24, 18 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Great job! Keep up the good work! :) Erick (talk) 15:25, 18 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment: The references should have their own section. ajmint (talk•edits) 14:35, 20 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
FIXED. Jaespinoza (talk) 19:04, 20 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved comments from The Rambling Man (talk) 10:02, 24 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Comments good work.
  • "Babasonicos" is missing a diacritic.
Fixed. Jaespinoza (talk) 10:00, 24 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • The "last awarded" field in the infobox is typically only used for defunct awards.

The Rambling Man (talk) 07:19, 24 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed. Thanks for your comments. Jaespinoza (talk) 10:00, 24 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved comments from NapHit (talk) 13:29, 25 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Comments
  • per WP:CONTEXTLINK bold links should be avoided add plainrowheaders to wikitable sortable to solve the issue
Fixed. Jaespinoza (talk) 23:29, 24 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Avoid using the semi-colon for bolding as is done in the reference section. Its a WP:ACCESS concern, as those using screen readers can't pick it up. Use the conventional three apostrophes instead
Fixed. Jaespinoza (talk) 23:35, 24 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • ref 8 has an odd spelling of September
Fixed. Jaespinoza (talk) 23:35, 24 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • ref 10 Time Inc has two full stops after it

NapHit (talk) 19:10, 24 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed. Jaespinoza (talk) 23:35, 24 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved comments from TBrandley (talk) 22:43, 25 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Comments
Fixed. Jaespinoza (talk) 19:34, 25 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Perhaps use actual sub-sections for general and specific in references, for WP:ACCESS
Fixed. Jaespinoza (talk) 19:34, 25 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

TBrandley 02:35, 25 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  • Quick comment – In the Rene Perez photo caption, wouldn't "with the music video for" be better as "for the music videos" in this sentence? In particular, we shouldn't be using "video" when giving three videos. Giants2008 (Talk) 18:09, 14 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Fixed. Jaespinoza (talk) 19:02, 14 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I would imagine that each song should be notable enough for its own article (e.g. the unlinked songs should be redlinked) as they won a Latin Grammy. The Rambling Man (talk) 16:37, 11 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Jaespinoza (talk) 07:10, 20 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Support no reason this shouldn't be featured now, good work from the nom and from the reviewers. The Rambling Man (talk) 18:05, 10 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Jaespinoza (talk) 20:05, 10 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Featured_list_candidates/Latin_Grammy_Award_for_Best_Short_Form_Music_Video/archive1&oldid=1138480864"