Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of Agent Carter characters/archive1

The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was archived by PresN via FACBot (talk) 23:30, 3 November 2016 (UTC) [1].[reply]

List of Agent Carter characters[edit]

Featured list candidates/List of Agent Carter characters/archive1

Nominator(s): adamstom97 (talk) 12:08, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I am nominating this for featured list because this series was recently cancelled, and so the listing won't be changing. I (and several other editors) have been working on the article for over a year now, and I believe that it is good enough to become a featured list. - adamstom97 (talk) 12:08, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comment This looks more like an article than a list to me. I'd nominate this at WP:GAN first. The lead is too short for this page. Also, the descriptions of some of the characters are too short and some are too long; just try to balance them out. You can check out this page for an example.--Cheetah (talk) 04:31, 10 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The Smallville list has different sized sections for different characters as well, and I think it all boils down to how much information there is about each character which is presumably based upon importance. The lead can be expanded though. As for your first statement, I'm not sure how this isn't a list. We literally list characters. In fact, this seems like more of a list to me than some other articles I have seen promoted to FL (like this recent example). - adamstom97 (talk) 05:55, 10 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This page actually talks about each character. The prose in this page is twice as much as in that example you provided.--Cheetah (talk) 08:02, 10 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

So you think that all the prose makes it more of an article than a simple list? I could understand that, and a potential move to GA instead. - adamstom97 (talk) 09:59, 10 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, that's my opinion of this page.--Cheetah (talk) 20:54, 10 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comment this is much more like a GAN than an FLC, suggest this is closed and the nominator takes to the GA brigade. The Rambling Man (talk) 21:39, 25 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Crzycheetah and The Rambling Man: As you have suggested, I am going to take this over to GA now. Is there a specific process that I need to go through for ending this discussion? - adamstom97 (talk) 22:09, 25 October 2016 (UTC) Withdrawing by the nominator - The FLC staff will take care of it.--Cheetah (talk) 22:17, 25 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Closing. --Pres N 01:44, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Closing note: This candidate has been archived, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.