Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of Denver Broncos first-round draft picks/archive1
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The list was promoted by The Rambling Man 12:08, 29 August 2009 [1].
List of Denver Broncos first-round draft picks[edit]
Toolbox |
---|
Recently I noticed it's been over a year since I nominated a list here, so I decided to contribute a little more. I have been working on this list the past 5-6 days and now I believe it's ready to be nominated. I welcome any comments/criticism/questions! Thank you! --Crzycheetah 02:32, 13 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Dabomb87 (talk) 04:39, 15 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved issues, Dabomb87 (talk) |
---|
Comments from Dabomb87 (talk · contribs) Reviewing a list from the top for a change...
|
Support, all issues resolved. I would still prefer to see all em dashes centered, but it's not enough to hold up an excellent list from FL status.
Sources look good. Dabomb87 (talk) 04:39, 15 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
About.com (ref 5) isn't considered a reliable source.Newspapers should be in italics. You can do this by changing "publisher" to "work" in the citation templates.Use "p.", not "pp.", for single pages. You can do this by changing "pages" to "page" in the citation templates.- National Football League and Denver Broncos shouldn't be italicized. Change "work" to publisher for those refs. Dabomb87 (talk) 03:18, 14 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note FLC is currently short of reviewers; please consider reviewing one or more on the nomination list if you have not already (this message is being posted to all running FLCs). Dabomb87 (talk) 23:20, 14 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved comments from KV5 |
---|
Hope these comments help. KV5 (Talk • Phils) 01:44, 20 August 2009 (UTC)[reply] |
Support from KV5 (Talk • Phils) 13:39, 26 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved comments from Giants2008 (17–14) 21:52, 23 August 2009 (UTC)[reply] |
---|
Comments –
|
Support – Nice to see a draft picks list at FLC; there haven't been many during my time as a reviewer. Looks like a nice one. Giants2008 (17–14) 21:52, 23 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved comments from SRE.K.A.L.24
|
---|
Comments from -- SRE.K.A.L.24[c]
-- [[SRE.K.A.L.|L.A.K.ERS]] 00:46, 25 August 2009 (UTC)[reply] |
- Support Everything looks good to me, though I agree with KV5 that more about the players can be added onto the lead. -- [[SRE.K.A.L.|L.A.K.ERS]] 06:24, 25 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.