Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of Pakistan Twenty20 International cricketers/archive1
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The list was promoted by The Rambling Man 17:35, 1 August 2012 [1].
List of Pakistan Twenty20 International cricketers[edit]
List of Pakistan Twenty20 International cricketers (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Toolbox |
---|
I am nominating this for featured list because I think this meets the criteria to become a featured list. Also, this went through a Peer review before nominating here. Any comment or suggestion will be appreciated.... ZiaKhan 05:32, 9 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved comments from The Rambling Man (talk) 11:10, 17 July 2012 (UTC)[reply] |
---|
Comments
The Rambling Man (talk) 12:02, 11 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Still getting odd results on, say, sorting by Last now. I don't know how to fix it though. Sorry. The Rambling Man (talk) 07:44, 13 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Comment good work on the sorting. Note that when sorting by BBI, Anjum and Ahmed are out of order, and a batting average of 0 looks odd when all others are to two decimal places. The Rambling Man (talk) 11:10, 17 July 2012 (UTC)[reply] |
Resolved comments from NapHit (talk) 17:29, 19 July 2012 (UTC)[reply] |
---|
Comments
|
Resolved comments from Vensatry |
---|
Initial comments
—Vensatry (Ping me) 07:50, 21 July 2012 (UTC)[reply] I don't know what you did before. ESPNcricinfo isn't a print media. Since this being the name of the website, you should include that under work parameter. The publisher for ESPN cricinfo is ESPN EMEA. The choice of including publisher parameters is upto you. —Vensatry (Ping me) 12:56, 28 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
|
Support – Good work with the list. —Vensatry (Ping me) 09:32, 31 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Comments –
In the captains table, the winning percentage doesn't sort well at all. It either doesn't sort at all, or sorts one way but not the other. I have a hunch that the colspan used in the total column is causing the problem.None of the reference publishers should be italicized; the italics are used for printed publications, and I don't see a single one in this group that fits the bill.Giants2008 (Talk) 21:22, 26 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved comments from ♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛ Talk Email 12:07, 28 July 2012 (UTC)[reply] |
---|
*Comments
|
- Support ♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛ Talk Email 12:06, 28 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- You need to remove the rowspan="2" parameter from Cap, Name, First, Last and Mat, given you've added "General" in the row above, contrary to precedent.
- Done.
- Given that in twenty years, a large number of these players will have retired, meaning that the list will be covered in this symbol, it is really necessary?
- Removed.
- Personally I don't think {{sort dash}} is appropriate for the Bowling average column, as it means that the players without a bowling average sort above the best average of Mendis. I would prefer those players to sort at the end.
- Done.
- ESPNcricinfo is overlinked: I would suggest linking to it from the first reference, but not thereafter.
- Done.
- Refs #22, #23, and #33 need date of publication, and author adding.
- Done.
- In the Captains list, why does Inzamam-ul-Haq have a win percentage listed as 100%, while the rest are XX.XX. Surely, he should have 100.00?
- Yes, the only match he captained was won by Pakistan.
- Given that Tanvir Ahmed has 1 against his innings column, he should have a total listed in runs and HS, or there should be dashes in Inn, NO and 50.
- Done.