Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of San Diego Padres team records/archive1
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The list was promoted by Dabomb87 15:39, 1 July 2011 [1].
List of San Diego Padres team records[edit]
List of San Diego Padres team records (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Toolbox |
---|
Next team records article... probably get all of them to FL quality. Albacore (talk) 22:56, 12 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved comments from The Rambling Man (talk) 16:47, 16 May 2011 (UTC)[reply] |
---|
Comments
Reworded.
Done.
Consistently width="60%", done. |
- "All statistics in this section are drawn from the following source.[29]" reads odd too. There is no following source. There's an inline citation.
The Rambling Man (talk) 20:25, 15 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Perhaps you could just have: Source:[x] indented by one colon in front of each table? The Rambling Man (talk) 16:47, 16 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Comments –
"No Padre holds a Major League Baseball or National League record for any of the below statistics." Then two sentences later, we hear about how Hoffman is the all-time saves leader. If I were a person without much knowledge of baseball, this would be incredibly confusing to me. I understand why it's not indicated as such, since he played some for other teams. However, there does need to be some further explanation of why he's not an MLB record-holder as a Padre alone; maybe a note would be the best option.
In the first table, "Extra–base hits" should have a hyphen and not the dash. Same for On–base percentage.Giants2008 (27 and counting) 00:20, 22 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Removed.
I know that per WP:ACCESS, colored items need matching symbols. Along the same lines, wouldn't the items with symbols here need colors?Giants2008 (27 and counting) 00:22, 22 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- No, per User:RexxS and this comment.
- Support – Meets FL standards. Giants2008 (27 and counting) 21:03, 28 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Just noting that all applicable comments from Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of Seattle Mariners team records/archive1 have been applied to this article as well. Albacore (talk) 02:41, 11 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Comment What does "[last update]" mean in the refs? Is that really necessary?--Cheetah (talk) 20:27, 25 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- It comes up automatically in the Cite4Wiki tool; it's probably not necessary but doesn't really hurt or violate anything. Albacore (talk) 20:46, 25 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved comments from Wizardman Operation Big Bear 16:15, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply] |
---|
*Comments:
These are all things I probably should have seen and brought up in the Mariners' FLC, as re-reading that I see the same issues. Wizardman Operation Big Bear 16:03, 26 June 2011 (UTC)[reply] |
- Support. Wizardman Operation Big Bear 16:15, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Comments - Would it be better to add the references in the Record column? Looks unprofessional as "source:[*]". Afro (Talk) 17:17, 29 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- How so? Albacore (talk) 17:24, 29 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.
- ^ fake ref