Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of Sites of Special Scientific Interest in Avon

List of Sites of Special Scientific Interest in Avon[edit]

Renominating, as all of the issues are either fixed, or (in the case of US areas units) in the middle of being fixed (by User:Suicidalhamster - thanks for that). Old discussion is below. Any other issues we need to deal with? SP-KP 17:57, 5 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Cool. Renata 04:47, 6 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support I think all previous issues about area, units, references etc have been addressed and I'm now copying the format on List of Sites of Special Scientific Interest in Somerset. — Rod ^talk 14:13, 6 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Question: is the grid reference a standard Ordnance Survey thing? You may want to clarify that. -- Run e Welsh | ταλκ 13:11, 7 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yes it does seem to be the standard way of doing grid references. I've added a note about it and this reference. Does this help explain the issue? - Suicidalhamster 14:11, 7 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, it does. Support. -- Run e Welsh | ταλκ 14:20, 7 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Can we give some thought to whether the non-auto numbering of map links is the correct thing to do? I've just added in a missing site which I found out about while starting to work on the Gloucs list (EN's website, our source, has it in the wrong AoS). Because each map is given a specific numbered label I had to go through and renumber lots of entries. Is there a better method? SP-KP 15:38, 11 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I think i'm responsible for that! I did it so that the links appeared without brackets, so as not confuse inline citations with external map links, when you look at the article. I realise now that this makes it harder to add new sites (however this is unlikely to be a common occurrence). I'm not fussed which style is used. - Suicidalhamster 18:59, 11 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I agree it's not a big issue - new SSSI notifications have slowed to a snails pace. This shouldn't stand in the way of FL status for this article. SP-KP 12:41, 12 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Support - I believe all previous issues have been dealt with. (although I have edited this article a fair bit since the previous nomination.) - Suicidalhamster 11:32, 13 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]