Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of Star Fox titles/archive1
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The list was not promoted by Dabomb87 15:32, 25 June 2009 [1].
List of Star Fox titles[edit]
| Toolbox |
|---|
I am nominating List of Star Fox titles as I believe it meets all the requirements laid out in WP:WIAFL. The list's format is extensively based off of two previous FLs, List of Kirby media (which I guided through its FLC) and List of Harvest Moon titles. -- Nomader (Talk) 20:41, 24 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I forgot to mention this in the Kirby FLC, but spaced en dashes should be used for list separators rather than em dashes per MOS. E.g., "1993—Super Nintendo Entertainment System"-->1993 – Super Nintendo Entertainment System Dabomb87 (talk) 20:53, 24 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Thanks for the note. I've already changed them for the Star Fox list, and I'll go ahead and switch them up for the Kirby one. -- Nomader (Talk) 21:03, 24 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose This list is too small; it could easily be merged into Star Fox (series). In fact it already is in a sense: this seperate article is really just a listy-version of the prose in the series' article. The general rule of thumb is that a list should have at least 10 entries to warrant its own page. That's not a hard and fast rule, but I see no reason why this list of 6 needs to be separated from the main page. Though there is alot of info per title, that's not a substitute for such a small amount of listed items. Drewcifer (talk) 22:38, 24 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- I understand. I was kind of worried about the length after I finished writing it up. I don't think the series page itself is well-written compared to some other series pages, but it does seem I've unintentionally created a content fork. -- Nomader (Talk) 22:43, 24 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Suggest withdrawal and a merge as well. I missed this on the first look through. The list fails the recently introduced criterion 3b, as well as the "unwritten" ten-item limit on FLCs. Dabomb87 (talk) 23:33, 24 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Yeah, I noticed that too. I wasn't sure if it was a content fork or not when I had first finished, but it seems pretty clear to me now. I'll go ahead and request withdrawl. -- Nomader (Talk) 23:37, 24 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.