Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of international cricket centuries by Kevin Pietersen/archive1
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The list was promoted by Giants2008 00:11, 19 January 2013 [1].
List of international cricket centuries by Kevin Pietersen[edit]
List of international cricket centuries by Kevin Pietersen (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Toolbox |
---|
Branching out into cricket for a change. Firstly, I would like to thank AssociateAffiliate for the excellent work he did initially creating the list. I have merely polished his work and believe that it now meets the criteria. I will try and address all comments expediently. Cheers NapHit (talk) 03:13, 31 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved comments from Zia Khan 06:23, 1 January 2013 (UTC)[reply] |
---|
Comments
Glad to see you nominating a cricket list, I also did a little bit to the list last month. Zia Khan 05:25, 31 December 2012 (UTC)[reply] |
Resolved comments from The Rambling Man (talk) 11:21, 1 January 2013 (UTC)[reply] |
---|
Comments
The Rambling Man (talk) 13:47, 31 December 2012 (UTC)[reply] |
Resolved comments from —Vensatry (Ping me) 11:12, 5 January 2013 (UTC)[reply] |
---|
Comments
|
Comments –
- Test century 21 lists the result as Draw, which goes against the Drawn that is used elsewhere.
- All of the links in note B are repeats from note A. I doubt that any of them are necessary.
- If possible, reference 5 could use a page number for the relevant content. Giants2008 (Talk) 22:21, 8 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- "Pietersen has scored centuries against all Test cricket playing nations, with the exception of Bangladesh." – He also hasn't scored a century against Zimbabwe, who although boycotted by England, are once again a Test playing nation.
- "and is the first batsman to score 5,000 or more runs in Test cricket in under five years." Just to clarify, the references state that he was the first to score his first 5,000 runs. As far as I can tell, someone may have scored 5,000 runs in under five years before, just not their first 5,000; as such, I think the language needs tightening to reflect this. (Unless I've misread the sources.)
Other than those nitpicks, it looks pretty good to me. Harrias talk 16:59, 14 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.