Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Liverpool F.C. league record by opponent/archive1
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The list was promoted by Dabomb87 22:35, 14 March 2012 [1].
Liverpool F.C. league record by opponent[edit]
Liverpool F.C. league record by opponent (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Toolbox |
---|
I am nominating this for featured list because I believe the list meets the criteria. The list takes its format from luton Town F.C. league record by opponent, granted that list was promoted nearly three years ago, so guidelines might have changed, cheers NapHit (talk) 12:09, 16 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved comments from The Rambling Man (talk) 17:12, 17 February 2012 (UTC)[reply] |
---|
Comments
The Rambling Man (talk) 11:40, 17 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
|
Resolved comments from Eddie6705 (talk) 16:41, 19 February 2012 (UTC)[reply] |
---|
Comments
|
Quick comments –
The semi-colon after "against whom they have contested 185 league matches" should be a regular old comma instead.In the post-table footnote, check the last year in the title of the Pead book. I think it may be off by a century.Giants2008 (Talk) 00:27, 22 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved comments from HonorTheKing (talk) 16:29, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply] |
---|
Comments from someone with similar list -
|
- Quick drive-by comment - "The records include the results of matches played in the Lancashire League (from 1892 to 1893), The Football League (from 1893 to 1992, and then again from 1920 to 2009) and the Premier League (from 1992 to the present day)" has an error in it........ -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 13:23, 23 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved comments from Struway2 (talk) 10:01, 12 March 2012 (UTC)[reply] |
---|
Drive-by comments
Comments.
hope some of this helps, cheers, Struway2 (talk) 10:01, 12 March 2012 (UTC)[reply] |
- Support - I belive it meets the cretiria, also nice to see many clubs with the league record articles now been created (Malmo, ManUtd and Liverpool).
– HonorTheKing (talk) 09:23, 12 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Support – Looks good; well done NapHit. As an aside, I have to say it's quite nice to see that my humble list of Luton results from that long ago has actually turned out to be quite useful for the Wikipedia project as a whole, having inspired this and the other lists mentioned by Honor above. —Cliftonian (talk) 00:09, 13 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.