Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Lost (season 2)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Lost (season 2)[edit]
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page. No further edits should be made to this page. The closing editor's comments were: 10 days, 6 support, 0 oppose. Promote. Scorpion0422 01:33, 29 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Modelled after featured first and third season pages. If this is promoted, all of the Lost WikiProject lists will be featured. Here is how the page looked before I decided upgrade its quality. Self-nominate –thedemonhog talk • edits • box 19:02, 19 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Support, and an added bonus, if anyone didn't know, the top row of the episodes (title, episode number, etc) are transcluded to List of Lost episodes, helping to reduce redundant edits. -- Ned Scott 22:59, 19 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Support per nomination and promotion of Seasons 1 and 3. Well-written, fully referenced, comprehensive, nice short plot summaries, all other unmentioned FL criteria. Just about the only thing I have to bring up is the statement in the lead "The season takes place from November 4 to 27, 2004." Since dates are automatically re-formatted (is that right?) to date-month, wouldn't it make more sense to have something like "... 4 to 27 November, 2004"? •97198 talk 05:41, 21 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
? –thedemonhog talk • edits • box 17:49, 21 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Support — TV show coverage at its best. A fine example of the standard most such articles fail to met. --Jack Merridew 14:11, 21 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Support. Meets the FL requirements. -- Wikipedical 16:23, 21 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Support well-done, as fine as Seasons 1 and 3. I could mention there's one more list to go, but nevermind. igordebraga ≠ 19:22, 28 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]