Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Chesme Church
Chesme Church[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 3 Oct 2012 at 08:31:41 (UTC)
- Reason
- Good EV and high quality
- Articles in which this image appears
- Chesme Church
- FP category for this image
- Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture
- Creator
- A.Savin
- Support as nominator --Tomer T (talk) 08:31, 24 September 2012 (UTC)
- Support --Kürbis (✔) 19:25, 24 September 2012 (UTC)
- Support -- Jkadavoor (talk) 05:54, 25 September 2012 (UTC)
- Support -- Pine✉ 07:31, 25 September 2012 (UTC)
- Question is it just me, or was the perspective correction overdone and the top of the building is a tad bit wider than the bottom? --WingtipvorteX PTT ∅ 17:28, 26 September 2012 (UTC)
- Seeing no reply, and agreeing with King of Hearts, I Oppose this nom. --WingtipvorteX PTT ∅ 22:29, 28 September 2012 (UTC)
- Support - Spongie555 (talk) 04:03, 27 September 2012 (UTC)
- Support edit - Spongie555 (talk) 04:56, 1 October 2012 (UTC)
- Oppose. Looks oversaturated to me. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 08:07, 27 September 2012 (UTC)
- Oppose. Looks oversaturated and also too dark in my opinion. Jujutacular (talk) 01:14, 29 September 2012 (UTC)
- Oppose per King of Hearts and Jujutacular. Too dark in the sky and in the clouds. Mediran talk|contribs 12:34, 29 September 2012 (UTC)
- Edit 1 Uploaded Seems a bit harsh to oppose when a simple edit can fix the problem --Muhammad(talk) 17:36, 29 September 2012 (UTC)
- Support edit 1 Thanks Muhammad. Jujutacular (talk) 08:34, 30 September 2012 (UTC)
- Comment: Muhammad, I like your version indeed - would it be OK when I overwrite the previous image by this version? In general, I don't like to have various edits of the same file as separate files, but I'm not familiar with the FPC procedure here. - A.Savin (talk) 09:44, 30 September 2012 (UTC)
Promoted File:Spb 06-2012 Chesme Church.jpg --Julia\talk 23:14, 6 October 2012 (UTC)