Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Point Pelee marsh boardwalk

Point Pelee marsh boardwalk[edit]

This is a bold, striking panorama. I can't find any stitching artifacts and the image acts as an excellent representation of marsh lands; appears in wetland, marsh and boardwalk.

By Theyenine (talk · contribs)

Nominate and support. - La ï ka 21:15, 24 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose, lacking in detail. The grass just looks like noise. Night Gyr (talk/Oy) 22:49, 24 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. Too much sky here. I want to see more of the marsh. howch e ng {chat} 23:38, 24 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Oppose Pretty but needs more marsh SOADLuver 00:40, 25 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I feel bad opposing as its *really* pretty much the fault of your camera. Like no joke. I'm ditching my Olympus C-8080 (which actually gets alright pictures) but I'm interested in something that can capture ridiculous amounts of detail. Also.. why isn't this image in Point Pelle National Park? Well, I added it, so it is now.. drumguy8800 C T 03:58, 25 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. Horizon is bent, and the resolution is too low. Yes, too low, 500px in height makes it hard to see any details. --Dschwen 09:56, 25 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great panorama, size is fine for me. --- Chris 73 | Talk 17:46, 25 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. Bad lighting, lack of detail, and as Dschwen said, the horizon is bent. --Tewy 23:12, 25 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose the composition is a little poor, the subject isn't that clear, and the vertical resolution is a bit low.--Andrew c 00:38, 26 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Not promoted --KFP (talk | contribs) 00:33, 2 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]