Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Station model/1

Station model[edit]

Article (Edit · History) · Article talk (Edit · History) · Watch article · Watch article reassessment page

Result: No action. Article renominated at GAN. Geometry guy 18:21, 22 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The recent GA review of the article was quick failed when it only required a rudimentary copy edit. The edit was made in minutes. Two suggestions made by the previous editor required shortening the sections, which would cause the article to fail since they would then be too stubby, and the addition of bullet points, which are normally avoided in wikipedia articles, at least within the meteorology project. I need a new review, since I think the article meets GA criteria. Thegreatdr (talk) 04:36, 22 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you want a new review, I suggest you renominate the article at GAN rather than bring it here. It wasn't quick-failed, but was failed with a regular review, and correctly so, in my view. Geometry guy 09:41, 22 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

What do you think it needs for GA? Thegreatdr (talk) 14:07, 22 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'll comment on the talk page. Geometry guy 18:21, 22 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]