Wikipedia:Miscellany for enshrining/User:EEng

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This shrine is being considered for unshrinement in accordance with Wikipedia's unshrinement policy.

Please share your thoughts on the matter at this shrine's entry on the Shrines for unshrinement page.

Feel free to vandalize the shrine, but the shrine must not be blanked, and this notice must not be removed, until the discussion is closed. For more information, particularly on merging or moving the shrine during the discussion, read the guide to unshrinement.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Miscellany for enshrining (MfE) is a place where Wikipedians decide what should be done with way cool pages in the namespaces that aren't covered by other specialized enshrining discussion areas. Items sent here are usually discussed for seven days; then they are either enshrined, or deleted by an administrator, regardless of community consensus as evident from the discussion, inconsistent with policy, and with gleeful disregard of the rough consensus as desired.

4 Sebtemper 2016th

User: EEng

A shriner
A shiner
EEng's favorite hat, and favorite nightcap
(gaping hole in skull carefully concealed)
  • Wear silly hats. What kind of monument to EEng would this be without dubiously-relevant images? —David Eppstein (talk) 21:12, 4 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support a self-evidently self-absorbing abrasive. Robevans123 (talk) 08:20, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Userify instead. Badly in need of copyediting, and is very unfair to hominids. --Tryptofish (talk) 14:04, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Speedy delete as an attack page. I spend so long reading the page I forget to wash the dishes, do the laundry, cook the dinner, hoover the lounge, account for my personal hygiene, that I am certain that EEng's page is actually an affront on my health. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 13:09, 6 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Come to think of it, I've been forgetting to account for Ritchie's personal hygiene, too. --Tryptofish (talk) 19:15, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
More silly hats
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it.
More silly hats
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it.
More silly hats
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it.
More silly hats
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it.
More silly hats
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it.
More silly hats
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it.
More silly hats
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it.
More silly hats
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it.
More silly hats
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it.
More silly hats
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it.

Hatbox Ghost