Wikipedia:Peer review/Rennell Island/archive2

Rennell Island[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch peer review

A script has been used to generate a semi-automated review of the article for issues relating to grammar and house style; it can be found on the automated peer review page for October 2008.

This peer review discussion has been closed.
I've listed this article for peer review because as per FAC withdrawal notice a great deal of work has to be done. This needs serious work on prose, sourcing, and images (four images from a single internet cafe?)

I need assistance from fresh eyes. Feel free to edit as much as you want.

Thanks, Phenss (talk) 07:35, 12 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please read the peer review directions more carefully. Articles that have recently closed a previous Peer review OR have had an unsuccessful FAC have to wait two weeks (14 days) before they are submitted to Peer Review. The thought is that the PR and FAC should have many comments for improvement and these should all be thoroughly addressed BEFORE submitting to peer review. Since the FAC is a very detailed review (I checked), it is a waste of scarce PR resources to peer review this in its curent state. Sorry, Ruhrfisch _><>°^° 02:09, 15 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]