Wikipedia:Peer review/Slavoj Žižek/archive1

Slavoj Žižek[edit]

I believe this article does a pretty good job of explicating the thought of a recent philosopher/social critic. But the organization is not as tight as it might be. I'm also not quite sure how best to handle the extensive bibliographic references. Some semi-notable criticisms were moved (by me) to a daughter article, which I think improves the undue emphasis issue. Lulu of the Lotus-Eaters 16:55, 12 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Address the parts of the somewhat obscure language which is used to explain his concepts (derived from Lacan). Also, there needs to be more in the criticism section, but not too much. --Knucmo2 21:53, 13 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Need inline citations. Well, needs any references - self-referencing to other Wikipedia article is not acceptable (see Wikipedia:Cite your sources and similar). If German wiki cites no references, then this article is simply unreferenced. Also, consider splitting the list of works and articles, which currently take half of the article, into a separate article, like list of Max Weber works.--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus ^Talk 16:37, 16 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The writer of this article does not seem sufficiently familiar with Zizek's work. Some of the definitions are not clear at all, too vague and inarticulate.