Wikipedia:Peer review/Supernature (Goldfrapp album)/archive1

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Supernature (Goldfrapp album)[edit]

An excellent album that deserves promotion to featured article status. References are already included, though only to a limit. Are there any suggestions, comments, or objections that can be addressed before it is submitted to featured article candidates? —Eternal Equinox | talk 22:50, 23 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

  • Some minor issues:
  • "It was produced by Goldfrapp," is rather redundant, seeing the first line
  • Duos should be duo's
  • The first sentence under "Release summary" is a run-on
  • All quotes should have citations. The 2nd quote under Release summary lacks a citation.
  • "although the album does have some good song " should be some good songs
  • "The Evening Standard in London, also named" the comma is unneeded
  • "USA Sales as of week 2: 13,700" should be converted into a sentence
  • "After falling off the charts after 14 weeks," perhaps "for 14 weeks" would do better than after?
  • The article is short (at least compared to the rest of the featured articles), so I'm wondering if it makes the "comprehensive" requirement of WP:WIAFA. Can any other relevant information be added to the article? Perhaps the lead can be expanded also.

Thanks, AndyZ t 23:22, 23 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! Are there any other issues that can be addressed? —Eternal Equinox | talk 02:00, 24 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
4 inline citations seems kind of weak, even for an article of this size. The numbers in the charts should be cited. AndyZ t 02:17, 24 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I will indeed continue to cite my sources as I locate them, but as the article currently stands, is there anything you would suggest adding or removing? —Eternal Equinox | talk 02:22, 24 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I think "Release Summary" should go before "Critical response". I can't think of (right off the top of my head) anything to add to the article, but seeing the length of Smile (Brian Wilson album), this article looks quite short. AndyZ 20:04, 24 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Now that I've developed a "making of the record" section, which I've yet to actually include in the article, but bear with me here, are there any other specific aspects of the album that could be added and/or removed? —Eternal Equinox | talk 20:26, 25 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

All right, I've inserted the "making of the record" into the article; the writing is rather poor right now, but I'll tidy and fix it up later on. Any other suggestions, please? —Eternal Equinox | talk 00:34, 26 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Peer_review/Supernature_(Goldfrapp_album)/archive1&oldid=190248921"