Wikipedia:Peer review/Valenzuela City/archive1

Valenzuela City[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch peer review

This peer review discussion has been closed.
I've listed this article for peer review because I've wanted to see the article going after its first peer reviewing, and also the grammar inconsistencies etc.

Thanks, JL 09 ^_q?_{_c} 12:57, 21 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Lead should be expanded. Three paragraphs with each at least four lines. Read Wikipedia:LEAD--Diaa abdelmoneim (talk) 22:51, 27 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Each fact in the article should be referenced. So paragraphs that don't have a reference at the end should have one. Read Wikipedia:Inline Citations and [[Wikipedia:Verifiability]--Diaa abdelmoneim (talk) 22:51, 27 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
You don't have anything in the Notes section so remove it--Diaa abdelmoneim (talk) 22:51, 27 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
"Citations" section should be "References"--Diaa abdelmoneim (talk) 22:51, 27 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
"References" section can be bibliography or Sources--Diaa abdelmoneim (talk) 22:51, 27 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Provide ISBN for book references and fill out parameters of {{cite book}}--Diaa abdelmoneim (talk) 22:51, 27 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]