Wikipedia:Requests for mediation/shiatsu

shiatsu

The filing party (the editor who opened this request) will add the basic details for this dispute below.

Editors involved in this dispute

1. Johntosco (talk · contribs) – filing party
2. Alexbrn (talk · contribs)

Articles affected by this dispute

1. Shiatsu (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Other attempts at resolving this dispute that you have attempted

• Talk:shiatsu#I think it is original research

Issues to be mediated

What is this dispute about? What sections, sentences, or issues in the article(s) can you not agree on? If you are the editor who opened this request, list these issues to be mediated under "Primary issues". If you did not open this request, you can add additional issues to be mediated under "Additional issues". The issues to be mediated would be properly agreed upon later, if this request for mediation is accepted.

Primary issues (added by the filing party)

1. I have been denied informal mediation by Hasteur, who has closed my discussion.
2. Could I have some sort of mediation or is it denied to me for some particular reason? I only stated that I think something is original research and therefore should be removed. I even asked for clarification - which was not given, nor forthcoming since I was denied the possibility of discussing it - about the meaning of original research in this case.

I am sorry. I think this case should be closed. I am not very wikipedia savvy and did not see that Alexbrn had replied on the talk page when I asked for mediation. Johntosco (talk) 09:02, 5 December 2013 (UTC)

Additional issues (added by other parties)

• Additional issue 1
• Additional issue 2

Parties' agreement to mediation

If you are a named party, please sign below and indicate whether you agree or refuse to participate in mediation. Remember that all editors are obliged to resolve disputes about content through discussion, mediation, or other similar means. If you do not wish to participate in mediation, you must arrange another form of dispute resolution. Comments and questions should be made underneath the numbered list below, to avoid confusion.

1. Agree. Johntosco (talk) 22:57, 4 December 2013 (UTC)

I am sorry. I think this case should be closed. I am not very wikipedia savvy and did not see that Alexbrn had replied on the talk page when I asked for mediation. Johntosco (talk) 09:02, 5 December 2013 (UTC)

Decision of the Mediation Committee

This section should only be edited by a mediator. The Mediation Committee's representative will indicate in due course whether the request is accepted (meaning a mediator will be assigned) or rejected (meaning you will have to try a different type of dispute resolution). If the mediator asks you a question in this section, you may edit here.

• Reject because the filing party wishes to withdraw this request. For the Mediation Committee, AGK [•] 17:15, 7 December 2013 (UTC)