Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2020 February 29

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Help desk
< February 28 << Jan | February | Mar >> March 1 >
Welcome to the WikiProject Articles for creation Help Desk Archives
The page you are currently viewing is a transcluded archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current Help Desk pages.


February 29[edit]

11:24:16, 29 February 2020 review of submission by The Supermind[edit]

Can you see my draft? I condense it to shorter paragraph excluding the kissing incident with his sister which is highly controversial subject among reviewers. I tried to add other sources but all failed to meet notability guideline and no Google indexes indicate sources concerning about notability as the reviewers said. This is difficulty for me as all Google Search source are the same kind of style.

The Supermind (talk) 11:24, 29 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The Supermind, The only coverage of this subject revolves around WP:ONEEVENT. The subject simply isn't notable at this time which is why the draft was outright rejected. Sulfurboy (talk) 11:30, 29 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Okay I understand your reason but if I added sources about his life and career regardless of the kissing event, does justify the notability? After its failure, I will delete the draft. The Supermind (talk) 12:27, 29 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, The Supermind. None of the cited sources (edailybuzz.com, starnetworths.com, and celebsmoney.com) is reliable. Rejection is meant to be final, to convey that the topic is not notable (not suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia). No amount of editing can fix that. There is no option to re-submit the draft because volunteers do not intend to review it again. --Worldbruce (talk) 12:42, 29 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

11:56:45, 29 February 2020 review of submission by Ketanforwagh[edit]


We need a full explanation for rejecting the Draft Because we have the right's to know the exact reason


Ketanforwagh (talk) 11:56, 29 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ketanforwagh Who is "we"? Only one person should be operating your account. Regarding the draft, it does not show how the person meets Wikipedia's special definition of a notable person as described in independent reliable sources with significant coverage. It reads very much like a resume and not an encyclopedia article. You may wish to read Your First Article for more information. 331dot (talk) 12:00, 29 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

What kind of detail Needed ? Ketanforwagh (talk) 12:22, 29 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't open a new section for every comment you wish to make; simply edit the existing section for any follow up comments. As I said, you need to show with significant coverage in independent reliable sources how this person meets Wikipedia's special definition of a notable person. Again, who is "we"? 331dot (talk) 12:27, 29 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

12:30:57, 29 February 2020 review of submission by Ketanforwagh[edit]

Remove Some unwanted Link Applying for re-review Ketanforwagh (talk) 12:30, 29 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Ketanforwagh. Rejection is meant to be final, to convey that the topic is not notable (not suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia). No amount of editing can fix that. There is no option to re-submit the draft because volunteers do not intend to review it again. --Worldbruce (talk) 12:44, 29 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

13:44:45, 29 February 2020 review of submission by EeveIndia[edit]


The article does not support or promote any brand or company. It's sole purpose is to provide information to the users and is not aimed towards marketing or advertising the product. Please re-review the article. Appropriate changes have been made.

EeveIndia (talk) 13:44, 29 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

EeveIndia, Yeah we're not going to accept an overly promotional article about a company that was created by the company. I would worry about the notices that have been posted to your talk page and address those. Sulfurboy (talk) 13:49, 29 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
EeveIndia Providing information is the definition of promotion. Wikipedia is not for merely providing information. 331dot (talk) 15:19, 29 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

17:38:52, 29 February 2020 review of draft by Olexander11[edit]


Hello! I need your help to get my article published and not deleted. What can I change or add to my article to make it better? Olexander11 (talk) 17:38, 29 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Olexander11, Please refer to the provided links in the decline message. These pages give detailed explanations on what we are looking for to show notability. If after reading those you have questions about the policies, please let us know. Sulfurboy (talk) 18:10, 29 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

20:02:10, 29 February 2020 review of submission by Blck1989blck[edit]


Blck1989blck (talk) 20:02, 29 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Blck1989blck What exactly is your question? Are you asking why the article was rejected? Sam-2727 (talk) 21:22, 29 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 22:02:56, 29 February 2020 for assistance on AfC submission by GiedreCasaite[edit]


I would like to add this article here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Brill_Publishers_academic_journals It is not clear why it does not qualify for a Wikipedia article. I put the same information which is used for others scientific journals published in this category. Could you please specify?


GiedreCasaite (talk) 22:02, 29 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

GiedreCasaite, You should only add articles to categories that are in the mainspace (that is, that aren't drafts anymore). Your article is still a draft so shouldn't be added to mainspace categories until it is accepted. Sam-2727 (talk) 16:22, 1 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Need help on..

basic overview on how to edit Wikipedia pages with how to use the markup, how to include references, how to develop your article and how to improve your article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Artife (talk • contribs) 00:23, 1 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Artife, please add comments to a separate category in the future. I'm assuming by article you mean Draft:Keagan Hoffman, which you have created. Overall, your markup looks fine. I don't think you are struggling there. The number one problem with the article right now is that it isn't supported by sufficient independent, reliable sources. [1] isn't a reliable source, nor is it likely independent of the subject. Although this comment might vary from reviewer to reviewer, your article also seems to be written like an advertisement. See other Wikipedia articles for how to maintain a more neutral tone. Sam-2727 (talk) 16:22, 1 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/Archives/2020_February_29&oldid=985274769"