Wikipedia:WikiProject London/Assessment
Statistics[edit]
London-related articles by quality and importance | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Quality | Importance | ||||||
Top | High | Mid | Low | NA | ??? | Total | |
FA | 3 | 15 | 52 | 140 | 210 | ||
FL | 2 | 4 | 28 | 34 | |||
A | 1 | 1 | |||||
GA | 5 | 35 | 102 | 466 | 608 | ||
B | 20 | 77 | 208 | 910 | 20 | 1,235 | |
C | 16 | 87 | 412 | 3,115 | 64 | 3,694 | |
Start | 3 | 72 | 596 | 12,589 | 159 | 13,419 | |
Stub | 79 | 8,744 | 75 | 8,898 | |||
List | 3 | 21 | 93 | 542 | 11 | 670 | |
Category | 2 | 4,653 | 4,655 | ||||
Disambig | 4 | 52 | 56 | ||||
File | 515 | 515 | |||||
Portal | 1 | 24 | 25 | ||||
Project | 62 | 62 | |||||
Redirect | 20 | 377 | 679 | 1,076 | |||
Template | 2 | 387 | 389 | ||||
NA | 1 | 1 | |||||
Other | 1 | 71 | 72 | ||||
Assessed | 51 | 309 | 1,567 | 26,920 | 6,444 | 329 | 35,620 |
Unassessed | 84 | 359 | 443 | ||||
Total | 51 | 309 | 1,567 | 27,004 | 6,444 | 688 | 36,063 |
WikiWork factors (?) | ω = 139,947 | Ω = 4.99 |
Quality scale[edit]
- Category:FA-Class London-related articles
- Category:GA-Class London-related articles
- Category:B-Class London-related articles
- Category:Start-Class London-related articles
- Category:Stub-Class London-related articles
- Category:Unassessed London-related articles - unassessed - please start assessing
Grading scheme[edit]
Class | Criteria | Reader's experience | Editing suggestions | Example |
---|---|---|---|---|
FA | The article has attained featured article status by passing an in-depth examination by impartial reviewers from WP:Featured article candidates. More detailed criteria
The article meets the featured article criteria:
A featured article exemplifies Wikipedia's very best work and is distinguished by professional standards of writing, presentation, and sourcing. In addition to meeting the policies regarding content for all Wikipedia articles, it has the following attributes.
|
Professional, outstanding, and thorough; a definitive source for encyclopedic information. | No further content additions should be necessary unless new information becomes available; further improvements to the prose quality are often possible.[under discussion] | Marshalsea (as of March 2015) |
FL | The article has attained featured list status by passing an in-depth examination by impartial reviewers from WP:Featured list candidates. More detailed criteria
The article meets the featured list criteria:
|
Professional standard; it comprehensively covers the defined scope, usually providing a complete set of items, and has annotations that provide useful and appropriate information about those items. | No further content additions should be necessary unless new information becomes available. | List of winners of the London Marathon (as of March 2015) |
A | The article is well organized and essentially complete, having been examined by impartial reviewers from a WikiProject or elsewhere. Good article status is not a requirement for A-Class. More detailed criteria
The article meets the A-Class criteria:
Provides a well-written, clear and complete description of the topic, as described in Wikipedia:Article development. It should be of a length suitable for the subject, appropriately structured, and be well referenced by a broad array of reliable sources. It should be well illustrated, with no copyright problems. Only minor style issues and other details need to be addressed before submission as a featured article candidate. See the A-Class assessment departments of some of the larger WikiProjects (e.g. WikiProject Military history). |
Very useful to readers. A fairly complete treatment of the subject. A non-expert in the subject would typically find nothing wanting. | Expert knowledge may be needed to tweak the article, and style problems may need solving. WP:Peer review may help. | Class Not Used |
GA | The article meets all of the good article criteria, and has been examined by one or more impartial reviewers from WP:Good article nominations. More detailed criteria
A good article is:
|
Useful to nearly all readers, with no obvious problems; approaching (though not necessarily equalling) the quality of a professional publication. | Some editing by subject and style experts is helpful; comparison with an existing featured article on a similar topic may highlight areas where content is weak or missing. | Harmondsworth Great Barn (as of March 2015) |
B | The article meets all of the B-Class criteria. It is mostly complete and does not have major problems, but requires some further work to reach good article standards. More detailed criteria
|
Readers are not left wanting, although the content may not be complete enough to satisfy a serious student or researcher. | A few aspects of content and style need to be addressed. Expert knowledge may be needed. The inclusion of supporting materials should be considered if practical, and the article checked for general compliance with the Manual of Style and related style guidelines. | London Heathrow Airport (as of March 2015) |
C | The article is substantial but is still missing important content or contains irrelevant material. The article should have some references to reliable sources, but may still have significant problems or require substantial cleanup. More detailed criteria
The article cites more than one reliable source and is better developed in style, structure, and quality than Start-Class, but it fails one or more of the criteria for B-Class. It may have some gaps or missing elements, or need editing for clarity, balance, or flow.
|
Useful to a casual reader, but would not provide a complete picture for even a moderately detailed study. | Considerable editing is needed to close gaps in content and solve cleanup problems. | 13 Kensington Palace Gardens (as of March 2015) |
Start | An article that is developing but still quite incomplete. It may or may not cite adequate reliable sources. More detailed criteria
The article has a meaningful amount of good content, but it is still weak in many areas. The article has one or more of the following:
|
Provides some meaningful content, but most readers will need more. | Providing references to reliable sources should come first; the article also needs substantial improvement in content and organisation. Also improve the grammar, spelling, writing style and improve the jargon use. | 102.2 Smooth FM (as of March 2015) |
Stub | A very basic description of the topic. Meets none of the Start-Class criteria. | Provides very little meaningful content; may be little more than a dictionary definition. Readers probably see insufficiently developed features of the topic and may not see how the features of the topic are significant. | Any editing or additional material can be helpful. The provision of meaningful content should be a priority. The best solution for a Stub-class Article to step up to a Start-class Article is to add in referenced reasons of why the topic is significant. | .london (as of March 2015) |
List | Meets the criteria of a stand-alone list or set index article, which is an article that contains primarily a list, usually consisting of links to articles in a particular subject area. | There is no set format for a list, but its organization should be logical and useful to the reader. | Lists should be lists of live links to Wikipedia articles, appropriately named and organized. | List of architectural sculpture in the City of Westminster (as of March 2015) |
Each London related article should have an assessment of quality and importance on its talk page using the {{WikiProject London}} template, such as {{Wikipedia:WikiProject London|class=B|importance=high}}
.
Quality scale[edit]
The following quality classes are used to categorise articles on Wikiproject London:
- Stub class: No structure, only brief sentence or two - Use
class=Stub
- Start class: Some structure, brief paragraphs - Use
class=Start
- C class: improved structure and details separating article into topics but requiring, further development such as references, images, etc. - Use
class=C
- B class: developed structure, at least one paragraph for most required headers, in-line sourcing, includes map and at least one image - Use
class=B
- Good Article (GA) class: all required headers with complete coverage of subject and relevant images. Must have been nominated for and have passed a Good Article review - Use
class=GA
- List: an article that takes the form of a list rather than prose. An introduction is still required and images may be included - Use
class=List
- A class: NOT USED
- Featured Article (FA) class: complete, professional standard article, which must have been nominated for and have passed a Featured Article Review - Use
class=FA
- Featured List(FL) class: complete list, which must have been nominated for and have passed a Featured List Review - Use
class=FL
Other administrative classes for use on non-article pages include:
- Portal class: for the Wikiproject London portal and its sub-pages - Use
class=Portal
- Project class: for the project page and sub-pages - Use
class=Project
- Category class: for categories - Use
class=category
- Template class: for templates - Use
class=template
- Redirect class: for redirect pages = Use
class=redirect
- Book class: for books = Use
class=book
Importance scale[edit]
Log[edit]
May 9, 2024[edit]
Renamed[edit]
- Thematic House renamed to Cosmic House.
Reassessed[edit]
- T. Rex (band) (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Start-Class to B-Class. (rev · t)
Assessed[edit]
- Category:Bromley F.C. seasons (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
- Cosmic House (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Redirect-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
- House of Commons of the United Kingdom (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as B-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Top-Class. (rev · t)
- Royal Terrace Pier (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Unassessed-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Unknown-Class. (rev · t)
- The Old Church (Stoke Newington) (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Unassessed-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Unknown-Class. (rev · t)
May 8, 2024[edit]
Renamed[edit]
- James Floyd (actor) renamed to James Krishna Floyd.
- Romney Street Group renamed to Romney Street Group.
- Sylvia Noble renamed to List of Doctor Who supporting characters.
- Zoë Garbett renamed to Zoë Garbett.
Reassessed[edit]
- High Commission of Antigua and Barbuda, London (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to Redirect-Class. (rev · t)
- Karl Marx pub crawl (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t) Importance rating changed from Unknown-Class to Low-Class. (rev · t)
- Keston Roman villa (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to C-Class. (rev · t)
- Secretum (British Museum) (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from B-Class to FA-Class. (rev · t)
Assessed[edit]
- 10th G7 summit (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as C-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
- 2024 Hainault sword attack (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
- Claudio Silvestrin (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
- Category:Cricketers from Greater London by borough (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
- Category:Cricketers from the London Borough of Bromley (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
- Category:Cricketers from the London Borough of Ealing (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
- Category:Cricketers from the London Borough of Enfield (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
- Category:Cricketers from the London Borough of Haringey (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
- Category:Cricketers from the London Borough of Havering (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
- Category:Cricketers from the London Borough of Hillingdon (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
- Category:Cricketers from the London Borough of Redbridge (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
- Category:Cricketers from the Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
- Dickens's London (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Unassessed-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Unknown-Class. (rev · t)
- Edgwarebury (ward) (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Unassessed-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Unknown-Class. (rev · t)
- Draft:Edward Cruttwell (talk) assessed. Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
- Gareth Roberts (politician) (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
- Gladstone Park, London (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Unassessed-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Unknown-Class. (rev · t)
- Hackney Academy (later Hackney College) (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Unassessed-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Unknown-Class. (rev · t)
- Hatch End (ward) (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Unassessed-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Unknown-Class. (rev · t)
- Headstone South (ward) (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Unassessed-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Unknown-Class. (rev · t)
- James Krishna Floyd (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Stub-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
- Jay Simon (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
- Lambeth Endowed Charities (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Unassessed-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Unknown-Class. (rev · t)
- Loughborough Road (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Unassessed-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Unknown-Class. (rev · t)
- Money in the Bank (2023) (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as B-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
- Sofie Hagen (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Unknown-Class. (rev · t)
- Draft:Sole Bovelli (talk) assessed. Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
- West Kent Golf Course nature reserve (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Unassessed-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Unknown-Class. (rev · t)
- Whitechapel Mount (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Unassessed-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Unknown-Class. (rev · t)
Removed[edit]
- Artists Anonymous Theatre Network (talk) removed.
- Brondesbury (talk) removed.
- City Road (talk) removed.
- Draft:George Buchanan (journalist) (talk) removed.
- Draft:Ivory Duo Piano Ensemble (talk) removed.
- Draft:Lia Cataldo (talk) removed.
- Draft:Ryan De La Cruz (talk) removed.
- Samuel Smiles (talk) removed.
- Draft:Sarah Sackman (talk) removed.
- Draft:Tipis on the Green (talk) removed.
- Zack Polanski (talk) removed.
May 4, 2024[edit]
Assessed[edit]
- Category:Casinos in London (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
- Christoph Silber (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
- Hounslow West (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Unassessed-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Unknown-Class. (rev · t)
- Category:Military units and formations in Hackney, London (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
- Paul Sika (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
- Streatham Common and Vale (ward) (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Unassessed-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Unknown-Class. (rev · t)
- Tottenham War Services Institute (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Unassessed-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Unknown-Class. (rev · t)
May 3, 2024[edit]
Reassessed[edit]
- Abney Park Chapel (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to B-Class. (rev · t)
- Dazzle ship (14–18 NOW) (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Unassessed-Class to C-Class. (rev · t)
- Embassy of Uruguay, London (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Redirect-Class to Stub-Class. (rev · t) Importance rating changed from NA-Class to Unknown-Class. (rev · t)
- Sheen Priory (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Stub-Class to Start-Class. (rev · t)
- Shir Hayim (talk) reassessed. Quality rating changed from Start-Class to Stub-Class. (rev · t)
Assessed[edit]
- Deodar Road (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Unassessed-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Unknown-Class. (rev · t)
- Deptford Cinema (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Unassessed-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Unknown-Class. (rev · t)
- London Buses route SL2 (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
- London Buses route SL3 (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Start-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
- Category:Military units and formations in Chelsea, London (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
- Category:Military units and formations in London (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
- Category:Military units and formations in St Pancras, London (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
- Category:Military units and formations in the City of Westminster (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Category-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
- Draft:Robert Newmark (talk) assessed. Importance assessed as NA-Class. (rev · t)
- Wu-Lu (talk) assessed. Quality assessed as Unassessed-Class. (rev · t) Importance assessed as Low-Class. (rev · t)
Removed[edit]
- Draft:Augmentum Fintech (talk) removed.