Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/Peer review/Hannibal (Barcid)

Hannibal[edit]

I didn't know of this page and started a normal Peer Review, so I request members of the project to take a look at Hannibal and its associated peer review. If you wish to respond here you can as well as both are on my watchlist. Thanks. Nobleeagle (Talk) 00:18, 19 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Kirill Lokshin[edit]

Very nice article! A variety of minor issues that could be improved, though:

Add {{Infobox Military Person}} at the top?
Footnotes! In particular, things like direct quotes require specific citations; and generous addition of them for key facts throughout would be appropriate as well.
The links in the "See also" section are redundant, and can be trimmed.
The list of films bears the disclaimer "This list is incomplete"; it's an issue to be fixed, either by completing it or by removing the tag.
Maybe use {{cquote}} for the various long quotes in the article?

Overall, though, this is quite well written! Keep up the great work! Kirill Lokshin 00:33, 19 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

ERcheck[edit]

I second Kirill Lokshin's comments — very nice article; footnotes needed.

Footnotes: The article uses <ref><nowiki> tags for the few references. Likely, the references have been used for the entire article, not just those citations; also, there are likely specific page references that apply in various locations in the article. Using <nowiki><ref name="yyyy"> for general citations, and <ref> for specific pages, for example, would help. (You are probably aware of this reference, but just in case, see Wikipedia:Footnotes.) —ERcheck (talk) @ 00:47, 19 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]