Wikipedia talk:Wikipedia Signpost/2012-05-28/Arbitration report

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Discuss this story

Please correct the statement to be a request for a meeting with Gregory Kohs rather than having had a meeting with Eric Barbour. See my correction at User_talk:Fæ#Request_for_arbitration. -- (talk) 06:23, 28 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

 Done Thanks. —James (TalkContribs) • 5:31pm 07:31, 28 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The current version makes it sound as if the meeting already happened. Please see thekohser's reply. Wikimania 2012 is in July 2012. As far as I'm aware, there aren't any definite plans for a meeting; there's only musings. --Michaeldsuarez (talk) 12:13, 28 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Ah sorry for the misunderstanding, I've corrected it accordingly. Thanks Michael! —James (TalkContribs) • 9:35am 23:35, 28 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. It was just musings. Given my travel plans for this summer, I was unable to commit to anything more concrete and lost the email thread into the background noise of my life. MBisanz talk 17:08, 29 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Not sure if it's relevant, but perhaps the GoodDay RFAR request should mention that I am their mentor? Steven Zhang Get involved in DR! 14:39, 28 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
    • Ah yes, I've edited the section accordingly, thanks Steven! :) —James (TalkContribs) • 9:35am 23:35, 28 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Greg Kohs, the film producer? Why should anyone care if a Wikipedia editor is meeting with him? Delicious carbuncle (talk) 11:34, 29 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

No, the ex-Wikipedia user. —James (TalkContribs) • 4:25pm 06:25, 30 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
A film producer would be appropriate, due to the massive drama production about to take place (melodrama? soap opera? geek tragedy?) -- Seth Finkelstein (talk) 09:16, 30 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
For those lucky enough not to know, "our" Gregory Kohs is a banned user of some disrepute, who frequents the same WP:BADSITES as Delicious Carbuncle. DC's comment may therefore be taken as tongue in cheek. Rich Farmbrough, 12:16, 30 May 2012 (UTC).[reply]
  • Note: Two requests for amendment in my recent case are outstanding. Currently they are looking like they will be turned dowon without reason. Rich Farmbrough, 13:21, 30 May 2012 (UTC).[reply]

Please correct the links regarding GoodDay; they should point to Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/GoodDay, not to Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case#GoodDay. -- Michael Bednarek (talk) 13:18, 1 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, sorry about that, at the time I wrote it it was still pending review. —James (TalkContribs) • 9:10pm 11:10, 4 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]