Wikipedia talk:Wikipedia Signpost/2014-06-11/Traffic report

Discuss this story

It seems like since it is June 14th, this list is two weeks behind. I realize that you can't put a June 8-14 list together by press date but there must already be a June 1-7 list ready, right? Would this be possible? Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 13:08, 14 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Good catch, Liz. I've fixed the date range to 1–7 June. Ed ^{[talk] [majestic titan]} 23:01, 14 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wow, no Facebook? :) --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 13:10, 14 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I don't see Facebook in this week's traffic report. ~~}IMr*|(60nna)I{~~ 01:22, 15 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I suggest that the GoT figures do not represent orthogonal measurements (that is, the folks looking at one are generally the same folks as those looking at the other related articles), and that it makes more sense to list "closely related articles" in the same box as the highest viewed of the group (thus - listing the three articles and their respective viewership), but not adding figures together. Collect (talk) 13:35, 14 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I'm With PK on this one: Facebook's absence is a little surprising. In my opinion, the absence of Facebook is a Christmas Miracle (and in the month of June). Wonder why it didn't crack the top 10 this week? TomStar81 (Talk) 17:28, 14 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]