Category talk:Animal anatomy

Animal anatomy
FFFI have beenmassively boost the amount of information Wikipedia provides on animal anatomy but right now it not : ]] or zootomy - the parent page (perhaps with this article merged into it)
 * [[animal anatomyvuyf
 * vertebrate anatomy
 * mammal anatomy (perhaps also marsupial anatomy and montreme anatomy)
 * bird anatomy - there is already a bird skeleton article, and more than enough info can be taken from the bird articlenatomy]] (as of 08/05/06 redirects to reptile)
 * amphibian anatomy
 * bony fish anatomy
 * cartilaginous fish anatomy
 * invertebrate anatomy
 * crustacean anatomy
 * insect anatomy etc...
 * The list could go on forever, I'm not sure whether ALL the possible articles deserve to exist, but most certainly the mammal/bird/reptile/amphibian/fish ones do, as that is what we all grown up with as the five main animal groups from early school. These article currently exist to deal with this field:


 * cat anatomy - poor
 * dog anatomy - good, but isn't really anatomy, more their physical appearance
 * frog zoology - good
 * [category:horse anatomy] - a whole category, with articles such as equine forelimb anatomy
 * [catagory:marsupial zootomy]
 * [catagory:dog anatomy]
 * bird skeleton - good
 * I have to admit I am no expert, I propose this in the hope that someone who is can help. What does everyone think? mastodon 15:59, 8 May 2006 (UTC)