Category talk:Former Roman Catholics

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Opening heading[edit]

See Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2007_July_9 and Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2007_July_23. Andries 10:12, 4 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

People should not be included in categories such as this unless their former religion is notable in relation to both of Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion. Wikipedia:Categorization of people states:

Category tags regarding religious beliefs and sexual preference should not be used unless two criteria are met:
  • The subject publicly self-identifies with the belief or preference in question;
  • The subject's beliefs or sexual preferences are relevant to the subject's notable activities or public life, according to reliable published sources.

--Jeffro77 (talk) 04:56, 18 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Tim Pawlenty should be added to list of former Catholics. Many conservative Republican Catholics have taken a liking to him but don't realize that he is a former Catholic. Conservative Catholics won't vote for a former Catholic.Prattlement (talk) 18:43, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Roger Ebert was not a former Catholic. Even his wikipdia article says he had a Catholic funeral.24.155.250.20 (talk) 21:30, 30 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy renaming discussion[edit]

Moved from WP:CFDS
 – Fayenatic London 20:46, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


While I see your point, you might as well argue the other way around per WP:NOTFINISHED. Ergo: If you want to make a more complete category tree, feel free, but until then, shouldn't the more generic implications prevail? PPEMES (talk) 11:22, 2 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.