Category talk:Jesuit popes

Contested deletion
This page should not be speedily deleted because... given the notability of those who will be listed in this entry, the fact that there is only one possible listing at the moment should have no relevance. Looking through the reasons for deletion, I don't see any reference to the number contained in a category. Daniel the Monk (talk) 04:54, 14 March 2013 (UTC)

Delete - Does this really need to be here? A category for one thing? I think it should be deleted. Hires an editor (talk) 22:55, 15 March 2013 (UTC)

Delete - There has only been a single page that can be applicable to this and by the looks of it, it's going to stay that way for quite some time, (most likely, we're speaking years here). There is little rationale to justify this category. D arth B otto talk•cont 02:26, 17 March 2013 (UTC)

Delete - It seems a bit early to talk about the notability of those who will be listed. There's been one Jesuit pope in 1,500 years, so I think we can assume the category isn't going to start expanding too fast in the next few weeks. --FergusM1970Let's play Freckles 11:27, 6 April 2013 (UTC)


 * The people who commented here missed the arguments on the CFD page; see link in the box below. – Fayenatic  L ondon 18:49, 29 April 2013 (UTC)