Category talk:Young Earth creationism

Is this category really necessary? There is already a category for creationists. Harvestdancer 03:55, 2 January 2006 (UTC)

Young Earth Creationism is a Pseudoscience?
Based on arbitration and clarification on same, the Pseudoscience category, which has been applied to this category, requires a reliable source indicating that it is in fact pseudoscience to sustain its application. Can you point out some reliable source that will settle the matter? If not, we'll need to remove the Pseudoscience category tag from this category. Thank you.-- self-ref (nagasiva yronwode) (talk) 23:15, 9 October 2008 (UTC)

Source as requested. . . dave souza, talk 13:13, 26 January 2010 (UTC)

Category:Alternative chronologies
User:Editor2020, what is wrong with that category? Seems to fit this thing. --Hob Gadling (talk) 17:04, 4 May 2019 (UTC)
 * I don't think so but if you believe it does then go for it. Editor2020 (talk) 21:11, 4 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Well, "This category is for articles about theories setting forth a chronology that differs from the generally accepted academic consensus" is exactly what YEC does. I will add it again. --Hob Gadling (talk) 13:54, 5 May 2019 (UTC)