David Graeber bibliography

David Graeber was an American anthropologist and social theorist. Unless otherwise noted, all works are authored solely by David Graeber.

Books

 * Written with David Wengrow.
 * Written with David Wengrow.
 * Written with David Wengrow.
 * Written with David Wengrow.
 * Written with David Wengrow.
 * Written with David Wengrow.
 * Written with David Wengrow.
 * Written with David Wengrow.
 * Written with David Wengrow.
 * Written with David Wengrow.
 * Written with David Wengrow.
 * Written with David Wengrow.

Posthumous books and unfinished books

 * Conversations with Mehdi Belhaj Kacem, Nika Dubrovsky, and Assia Turquier-Zauberman.
 * Written with Nika Dubrovsky.
 * Coedited by Romy Ruukel.
 * Coedited by Setsuko Nakayama.
 * Coedited by Setsuko Nakayama.

Academic articles

 * There never was a West, Association of Social Anthropologists, 2006
 * There never was a West, Association of Social Anthropologists, 2006
 * There never was a West, Association of Social Anthropologists, 2006
 * There never was a West, Association of Social Anthropologists, 2006
 * There never was a West, Association of Social Anthropologists, 2006

Journalism and popular articles

 * (originally delivered as a keynote address during the "History Matters: Social Movements Past, Present, and Future" conference at the New School for Social Research on May 3, 2003)
 * Co-authored with Andrej Grubacic
 * (originally an address to Anthropology, Art and Activism Seminar Series at Brown University's Watson Institute, December 6, 2005)
 * A conversation between David Graeber and Thomas Piketty.
 * Co-authored with David Wengrow.
 * : review of Opening of David Graeber's review (p. 52): "There is a growing feeling, among those who have the responsibility of managing large economies, that the discipline of economics is no longer fit for purpose. It is beginning to look like a science designed to solve problems that no longer exist."
 * A conversation between David Graeber and Thomas Piketty.
 * Co-authored with David Wengrow.
 * : review of Opening of David Graeber's review (p. 52): "There is a growing feeling, among those who have the responsibility of managing large economies, that the discipline of economics is no longer fit for purpose. It is beginning to look like a science designed to solve problems that no longer exist."
 * A conversation between David Graeber and Thomas Piketty.
 * Co-authored with David Wengrow.
 * : review of Opening of David Graeber's review (p. 52): "There is a growing feeling, among those who have the responsibility of managing large economies, that the discipline of economics is no longer fit for purpose. It is beginning to look like a science designed to solve problems that no longer exist."
 * A conversation between David Graeber and Thomas Piketty.
 * Co-authored with David Wengrow.
 * : review of Opening of David Graeber's review (p. 52): "There is a growing feeling, among those who have the responsibility of managing large economies, that the discipline of economics is no longer fit for purpose. It is beginning to look like a science designed to solve problems that no longer exist."
 * A conversation between David Graeber and Thomas Piketty.
 * Co-authored with David Wengrow.
 * : review of Opening of David Graeber's review (p. 52): "There is a growing feeling, among those who have the responsibility of managing large economies, that the discipline of economics is no longer fit for purpose. It is beginning to look like a science designed to solve problems that no longer exist."
 * A conversation between David Graeber and Thomas Piketty.
 * Co-authored with David Wengrow.
 * : review of Opening of David Graeber's review (p. 52): "There is a growing feeling, among those who have the responsibility of managing large economies, that the discipline of economics is no longer fit for purpose. It is beginning to look like a science designed to solve problems that no longer exist."
 * A conversation between David Graeber and Thomas Piketty.
 * Co-authored with David Wengrow.
 * : review of Opening of David Graeber's review (p. 52): "There is a growing feeling, among those who have the responsibility of managing large economies, that the discipline of economics is no longer fit for purpose. It is beginning to look like a science designed to solve problems that no longer exist."
 * A conversation between David Graeber and Thomas Piketty.
 * Co-authored with David Wengrow.
 * : review of Opening of David Graeber's review (p. 52): "There is a growing feeling, among those who have the responsibility of managing large economies, that the discipline of economics is no longer fit for purpose. It is beginning to look like a science designed to solve problems that no longer exist."
 * A conversation between David Graeber and Thomas Piketty.
 * Co-authored with David Wengrow.
 * : review of Opening of David Graeber's review (p. 52): "There is a growing feeling, among those who have the responsibility of managing large economies, that the discipline of economics is no longer fit for purpose. It is beginning to look like a science designed to solve problems that no longer exist."
 * A conversation between David Graeber and Thomas Piketty.
 * Co-authored with David Wengrow.
 * : review of Opening of David Graeber's review (p. 52): "There is a growing feeling, among those who have the responsibility of managing large economies, that the discipline of economics is no longer fit for purpose. It is beginning to look like a science designed to solve problems that no longer exist."
 * A conversation between David Graeber and Thomas Piketty.
 * Co-authored with David Wengrow.
 * : review of Opening of David Graeber's review (p. 52): "There is a growing feeling, among those who have the responsibility of managing large economies, that the discipline of economics is no longer fit for purpose. It is beginning to look like a science designed to solve problems that no longer exist."
 * Co-authored with David Wengrow.
 * : review of Opening of David Graeber's review (p. 52): "There is a growing feeling, among those who have the responsibility of managing large economies, that the discipline of economics is no longer fit for purpose. It is beginning to look like a science designed to solve problems that no longer exist."
 * Co-authored with David Wengrow.
 * : review of Opening of David Graeber's review (p. 52): "There is a growing feeling, among those who have the responsibility of managing large economies, that the discipline of economics is no longer fit for purpose. It is beginning to look like a science designed to solve problems that no longer exist."
 * Co-authored with David Wengrow.
 * : review of Opening of David Graeber's review (p. 52): "There is a growing feeling, among those who have the responsibility of managing large economies, that the discipline of economics is no longer fit for purpose. It is beginning to look like a science designed to solve problems that no longer exist."
 * Co-authored with David Wengrow.
 * : review of Opening of David Graeber's review (p. 52): "There is a growing feeling, among those who have the responsibility of managing large economies, that the discipline of economics is no longer fit for purpose. It is beginning to look like a science designed to solve problems that no longer exist."
 * Co-authored with David Wengrow.
 * : review of Opening of David Graeber's review (p. 52): "There is a growing feeling, among those who have the responsibility of managing large economies, that the discipline of economics is no longer fit for purpose. It is beginning to look like a science designed to solve problems that no longer exist."
 * : review of Opening of David Graeber's review (p. 52): "There is a growing feeling, among those who have the responsibility of managing large economies, that the discipline of economics is no longer fit for purpose. It is beginning to look like a science designed to solve problems that no longer exist."
 * : review of Opening of David Graeber's review (p. 52): "There is a growing feeling, among those who have the responsibility of managing large economies, that the discipline of economics is no longer fit for purpose. It is beginning to look like a science designed to solve problems that no longer exist."