ISO 11784 and ISO 11785

ISO 11784 and ISO 11785 are international standards that regulate the radio-frequency identification (RFID) of animals, which is usually accomplished by implanting, introducing or attaching a transponder containing a microchip to an animal.

RF identification of animals requires that the bits transmitted by a transponder are interpretable by a transceiver. Usually, the bit stream contains data bits, defining the identification code and a number of bits to ensure correct reception of the data bits. ISO 11784 specifies the structure of the identification code. ISO 11785 specifies how a transponder is activated and how the stored information is transferred to a transceiver (the characteristics of the transmission protocols between transponder and transceiver)

These standards are updated and expanded in ISO 14223 which regulates "advanced" transponders for animals, and ISO 24631 which regulates testing procedures for conformance with ISO 11784 & 11785 as well as performance.

Introduction
The technical concept of animal identification described is based on the principle of radio-frequency identification (RFID). ISO 11785 is applicable in connection with ISO 11784 which describes the structure and the information content of the codes stored in the transponder.

The International Organization for Standardization (ISO) draws attention to the fact that compliance with clause 6 and Annex A of this International Standard may involve the use of patents concerning methods of transmission.

RF protocol
The carrier frequency for animal identification is 134.2 kHz. There are two ISO approved protocols in use to communicate between tag and reader:

FDX-A which uses the 125kHz frequency and a 10 bit code is not ISO compliant.

In DBP a 1 is encoded as 00 or 11 and a 0 is encoded as 01 or 10, such that there is at least one transition per bit (so 11 is encoded as 0011 and not as 0000 or 1111)

Code structure
ISO 11784:1996 Radio-frequency identification of animals - Code structure

The first three digits of the ID are the manufacturer code.

HDX
With half-duplex, the tag must store sufficient energy when the receiver's activating field is turned on to allow it to transmit when the activating field is switched off. This makes the receiver simpler, as it is not necessary to pick up the weak signal from the tag among the strong activating field. The disadvantage is that the HDX tag can not transmit when the activating field is turned on.

Telegram layout:


 * 8 Startbits 01111110,
 * 1 Animal – No animal indicator,
 * 14 'Reserved for future use' bits,
 * 1 Extra data indicator bit,
 * 10 Country code according to ISO 3166,
 * 38 ID bits,
 * 16 CCITT CRC over the previous 64 bits,
 * 24 Application bits

FDX
With full duplex, the tag can transmit immediately when in the presence of the receiver's activating field. The advantage is that the FDX tag can then transmit continuously and can therefore be read more quickly and more often.

Telegram layout:


 * 11 Startbits 00000000001,
 * 38 ID bits
 * 10 Country code according to ISO 3166,
 * 1 Extra application bits,
 * 14 Reserved bits,
 * 1 Animal bit,
 * 16 CCITT CRC over the previous bits
 * 24 Application bits

In FDX (at least), after the 11 startbits, a framing bit ('1') is sent after every 8 data bits.

Patents
Compliance with the standards may require use of techniques which are covered by (or claimed to be covered by) certain patents. ISO takes no position concerning the evidence, validity and scope of these patent rights.

Some patent holder has assured ISO that they will not exert their patent rights concerning FDX B technology. Other patent holders have assured ISO that they are willing to negotiate licenses under reasonable and non-discriminatory terms and conditions with applicants through the world. In this respect, the statement of the holders of these patent rights are registered with ISO.

Attention is moreover drawn to the possibility that some of the elements of this International Standard may be the subject of patent rights other than those identified above. ISO shall not be held responsible for identifying any or all such patent rights. In that connection, additional correspondences were received from two other companies not willing to forward pertinent declaration in accordance with the current ISO Directives.