Pearl Manuscript

The Pearl Manuscript (British Library MS Cotton Nero A X/2), also known as the Gawain manuscript, is an illuminated manuscript produced somewhere in northern England in the late 14th century or the beginning of the 15th century. It is one of the best-known Middle English manuscripts, the only one containing alliterative verse solely, and the oldest surviving English manuscript to have full-page illustrations. It contains the only surviving copies of four of the masterpieces of medieval English literature: Sir Gawain and the Green Knight, Pearl, Cleanness, and Patience. It has been described as "one of the greatest manuscript treasures for medieval literature", and "the most famous of all romance manuscripts".

Contents
The titles given here are those used by modern editors, all the poems being untitled in the manuscript. It has been foliated twice, first in ink and later in pencil; the second foliation is used here.


 * Pearl, ff. 41r–59v
 * Cleanness (also known as Purity), ff. 60r–86r
 * Patience, ff. 86r–94r
 * Sir Gawain and the Green Knight, ff. 94v–130r
 * A Middle English couplet beginning "Mi minde is mukul on on þat wil me noȝt amende", f. 129v

There are also a number of illustrations scattered throughout.

Date and place of origin
The text of the Pearl Manuscript is commonly dated on palaeographical grounds to the last quarter of the 14th century, or at the latest to the beginning of the 15th century, the illustrations being added at either the same time as the text or a little later. It has also been argued that it was produced for the Stanley family by a scribe whose dialect locates him to south-east Cheshire or north-east Staffordshire. In recent years several scholars have reidentified the scribe's dialect as Yorkshire, and Joel Fredell has pointed out stylistic and thematic similarities with illuminated manuscripts produced in York which suggest that the illustrations in Cotton Nero A X/2 were drawn and painted there in the first two decades of the 15th century.

History of the manuscript
It is not known who owned the manuscript for the first two hundred years of its history. The name "Hugo de" appears on the margin of one leaf, and perhaps (though this is disputed) "J Macy" on another, either of which might be interpreted as a mark of either ownership or authorship. Edward Wilson has speculated that it was held by the Stanley family; Elizabeth Salter that it formed part of the library of one Yorkshire monastery or another, and passed from them to the 16th-century collector John Nettleton. The recorded history of the manuscript begins some time before 1614 with a description of it in the private library catalogue of the Yorkshire book-collector Henry Savile of Banke as "An owld booke in English verse beginninge Perle plesant to Princes pay in 4º. Limned". Before 1621 it was evidently acquired by Sir Robert Cotton, being then listed as "Gesta Arthuri regis et aliorum versu Anglico [Deeds of King Arthur and other matters in English verse]". His librarian bound it along with two quite unrelated Latin texts, from which it was not separated until a rebinding in 1964. A catalogue of Cotton's collection printed in 1696 mentioned this volume, and it was, along with all the Cotton family's other manuscripts, donated to the British Museum when that institution was founded in 1753. It is now held by the British Library.

Description
The manuscript consists of 90 vellum folios now measuring 12 cm by 17 cm, though it seems to have been cropped from a larger size. The quiring comprises a single bifolium followed by seven gatherings of twelve leaves each and a single gathering of four leaves. Folio 39r, the first page of Pearl, is stained enough to suggest that the manuscript was once unbound and that this was its outer sheet. Most pages are ruled to allow for 36 lines of text. All four of the main poems in the manuscript were written by a single scribe using a Gothic textura rotunda script rather than the cursiva script that would be more usual in a late 14th-century vernacular poetry manuscript. The hand has been described as "distinctive, rather delicate [and] angular". The scribe's irregularity in following the ruled lines and his heavy use of abbreviations and ligatures has led to the suggestion that he was more used to notarial than literary work. Some letters which had faded or blurred have been redone by a later scribe, and this process of fading has continued; during the century that has passed since 1923 that year's EETS facsimile edition has become in many places more easily readable than the manuscript itself. There are 48 decorated initials in the manuscript, all written in blue with red penwork, which range in size from fifteen to two lines. It has often been argued that they were used to make clear the internal structure of each of the four poems.

Illustrations
The manuscript has twelve illustrations: four on ff. 41r–42v (immediately before Pearl), showing the dreamer sleeping, the dreamer approaching the stream, the dreamer seeing the maiden, and the dreamer trying to cross; two on ff. 60r–60v (immediately before Cleanness), showing Noah's Ark and Daniel at Belshazzar's feast; two on ff. 86r–86v (immediately before Patience), showing Jonah and the whale and Jonah preaching to the people of Nineveh; one on ff. 94v (immediately before Sir Gawain), showing the Green Knight at Camelot; and three on 129r–130r (immediately after Sir Gawain), showing Bertilak's wife tempting Sir Gawain, Gawain at the Green Chapel, and Gawain's return to Camelot. With one exception they all take up a complete side of a folio, a feature not found in any earlier English manuscript. They all depict scenes described in the four poems though not always with perfect accuracy, suggesting that the illustrator had not read them but was instead following suggestions from the manuscript's owner. They were created in two stages: first in black-and-white as ink drawings, then as paintings with the colour being applied with considerably less skill, perhaps by a different artist. Their overall quality was roundly abused by some 20th century critics, described as "crude and inartistic" by E. V. Gordon, and "the nadir of English illustrative art...infantile daubs" by R. S. and L. H. Loomis; more recently Kathleen L. Scott considered them the work of a professional, Sarah M. Horrall described them as "very competently executed", and Joel Fredell has judged them to be skilled work comparable to the miniatures of the Bolton Hours, if inferior to London work and the products of the International Gothic style.

Transmission of the text
The Pearl manuscript's scribe was not the author of the poems it contains, and indeed the number and nature of its scribal errors and textual anomalies show it to stand at some distance from the original manuscript or manuscripts. At least one line, and possibly several more, have been lost from the original poems, while others seem to have been rearranged or added. It may have been an inept copy of a prestige illuminated manuscript commissioned by some wealthy patron. It has also been suggested that the Pearl manuscript or its exemplar may have collected each of its four texts from a different manuscript.

First publication
The first published quotations from Cotton Nero A X/2 appeared in a footnote in the third volume of Thomas Warton's History of English Poetry in 1781, comprising twelve lines from Pearl and four from Cleanness. A further short quotation from Sir Gawain and the Green Knight was included in a footnote to Richard Price's new edition of Warton's History in 1824, and the poem was published in its entirety, edited by Frederic Madden, in 1839. Pearl, Patience and Cleanness were not edited until 1864, by Richard Morris.

Editions
Editions of the full contents:


 * . In two volumes.
 * This is considered the reference edition.
 * . In two volumes.
 * This is considered the reference edition.
 * This is considered the reference edition.

Translations
Translations of the full contents: