Stagnation point flow

In fluid dynamics, a stagnation point flow refers to a fluid flow in the neighbourhood of a stagnation point (in two-dimensional flows) or a stagnation line (in three-dimensional flows) with which the stagnation point/line refers to a point/line where the velocity is zero in the inviscid approximation. The flow specifically considers a class of stagnation points known as saddle points wherein incoming streamlines gets deflected and directed outwards in a different direction; the streamline deflections are guided by separatrices. The flow in the neighborhood of the stagnation point or line can generally be described using potential flow theory, although viscous effects cannot be neglected if the stagnation point lies on a solid surface.

Stagnation point flow without solid surfaces
When two streams either of two-dimensional or axisymmetric nature impinge on each other, a stagnation plane is created, where the incoming streams are diverted tangentially outwards; thus on the stagnation plane, the velocity component normal to that plane is zero, whereas the tangential component is non-zero. In the neighborhood of the stagnation point, a local description for the velocity field can be described.

General three-dimensional velocity field
The stagnation point flow corresponds to a linear dependence on the coordinates, that can be described in the Cartesian coordinates $$(x,y,z)$$ with velocity components $$(v_x,v_y,v_z)$$ as follows


 * $$v_x = \alpha x, \quad v_y = \beta y, \quad v_z = \gamma z$$

where $$(\alpha,\beta,\gamma)$$ are constants (or time-dependent functions) referred as the strain rates; the three strain rates are not completely arbitrary since the continuity equation requires $$\alpha+\beta+\gamma=0$$, that is to say, only two of the three constants are independent. We shall assume $$\gamma<0\leq \alpha$$ so that flow is towards the stagnation point in the $$z$$ direction and away from the stagnation point in the $$x$$ direction. Without loss of generality, one can assume that $$\beta \geq \alpha$$. The flow field can be categorized into different types based on a single parameter


 * $$\lambda = \frac{\alpha-\beta}{\alpha+\beta}$$

Planar stagnation-point flow
The two-dimensional stagnation-point flow belongs to the case $$\beta=0\, (\lambda=1)$$. The flow field is described as follows


 * $$v_x=kx, \quad v_z=-kz$$

where we let $$k=\alpha=-\gamma>0$$. This flow field is investigated as early as 1934 by G. I. Taylor. In the laboratory, this flow field is created using a four-mill apparatus, although these flow fields are ubiquitous in turbulent flows.

Axisymmetric stagnation-point flow
The axisymmetric stagnation point flow corresponds to $$\alpha=\beta\, (\lambda=0)$$. The flow field can be simply described in cylindrical coordinate system $$(r,\theta,z)$$ with velocity components $$(v_r,0,v_z)$$ as follows


 * $$v_r=kr, \quad v_z=-2kz$$

where we let $$k=\alpha=\beta=-\gamma/2>0$$.

Radial stagnation flows
In radial stagnation flows, instead of a stagnation point, we have a stagnation circle and the stagnation plane is replaced by a stagnation cylinder. The radial stagnation flow is described using the cylindrical coordinate system $$(r,z)$$ with velocity components $$(v_r,v_z)$$ as follows


 * $$v_r = -k\left(r - \frac{r_s^2}{ r}\right), \quad v_z = 2kz$$

where $$r_s$$ is the location of the stagnation cylinder.

Hiemenz flow
The flow due to the presence of a solid surface at $$z=0$$ in planar stagnation-point flow was described first by Karl Hiemenz in 1911, whose numerical computations for the solutions were improved later by Leslie Howarth. A familiar example where Hiemenz flow is applicable is the forward stagnation line that occurs in the flow over a circular cylinder.

The solid surface lies on the $$xy$$. According to potential flow theory, the fluid motion described in terms of the stream function $$\psi$$ and the velocity components $$(v_x,0,v_z)$$ are given by


 * $$ \psi = kxz,\quad v_x = kx, \quad v_z = -kz.$$

The stagnation line for this flow is $$(x,y,z)=(0,y,0)$$. The velocity component $$v_x$$ is non-zero on the solid surface indicating that the above velocity field do not satisfy no-slip boundary condition on the wall. To find the velocity components that satisfy the no-slip boundary condition, one assumes the following form


 * $$\psi = \sqrt{\nu k}x F(\eta), \quad \eta = \frac{z}{\sqrt{\nu/k}} $$

where $$\nu$$ is the Kinematic viscosity and $$\sqrt{\nu/k}$$ is the characteristic thickness where viscous effects are significant. The existence of constant value for the viscous effects thickness is due to the competing balance between the fluid convection that is directed towards the solid surface and viscous diffusion that is directed away from the surface. Thus the vorticity produced at the solid surface is able to diffuse only to distances of order $$\sqrt{\nu/k}$$; analogous situations that resembles this behavior occurs in asymptotic suction profile and von Kármán swirling flow. The velocity components, pressure and Navier–Stokes equations then become


 * $$v_x = kx F', \quad v_z = -\sqrt{\nu k} F, \quad \frac{p_o-p}{\rho} = \frac{1}{2} k^2x^2 + k\nu F' + \frac{1}{2} k\nu F^2$$
 * $$F' + FF -F'^2 + 1 =0$$

The requirements that $$(v_x,v_z)=(0,0)$$ at $$z=0$$ and that $$v_x\rightarrow kx$$ as $$z\rightarrow \infty$$ translate to


 * $$F(0)=0, \ F'(0)=0, F'(\infty)=1.$$

The condition for $$v_z$$ as $$z\rightarrow \infty$$ cannot be prescribed and is obtained as a part of the solution. The problem formulated here is a special case of Falkner-Skan boundary layer. The solution can be obtained from numerical integrations and is shown in the figure. The asymptotic behaviors for large $$\eta\rightarrow\infty$$ are


 * $$F\sim\eta -0.6479, \quad v_x\sim kx, \quad v_z\sim-k(z-\delta^*), \quad \delta^* = 0.6479 \delta$$

where $$\delta^*$$ is the displacement thickness.

Stagnation point flow with a translating wall
Hiemenz flow when the solid wall translates with a constant velocity $$U$$ along the $$x$$ was solved by Rott (1956). This problem describes the flow in the neighbourhood of the forward stagnation line occurring in a flow over a rotating cylinder. The required stream function is


 * $$\psi = \sqrt{\nu k}x F(\eta) + U \delta \int_0^\eta G(\eta) d\eta$$

where the function $$G(\eta)$$ satisfies


 * $$G'' + FG' - F'G =0, \quad G(0)=1, \quad G(\infty)=0$$

The solution to the above equation is given by $$G(\eta) = F(\eta)/F(0).$$

Oblique stagnation point flow
If the incoming stream is perpendicular to the stagnation line, but approaches obliquely, the outer flow is not potential, but has a constant vorticity $$-\zeta_o$$. The appropriate stream function for oblique stagnation point flow is given by


 * $$\psi = kxz + \frac{1}{2}\zeta_o z^2$$

Viscous effects due to the presence of a solid wall was studied by Stuart (1959), Tamada (1979) and Dorrepaal (1986). In their approach, the streamfunction takes the form


 * $$\psi = \sqrt{\nu k}x F(\eta) + \zeta_o \delta^2 \int_0^\eta H(\eta) d\eta$$

where the function $$H(\eta)$$


 * $$H'' + FH' - F'H =0, \quad H(0)=0, \quad H'(\infty)=1$$.

Homann flow
The solution for axisymmetric stagnation point flow in the presence of a solid wall was first obtained by Homann (1936). A typical example of this flow is the forward stagnation point appearing in a flow past a sphere. Paul A. Libby (1974) (1976) extended Homann's work by allowing the solid wall to translate along its own plane with a constant speed and allowing constant suction or injection at the solid surface.

The solution for this problem is obtained in the cylindrical coordinate system $$(r,\theta ,z)$$ by introducing


 * $$\eta = \frac{z}{\sqrt{\nu/k}}, \quad \gamma = -\frac{V}{2\sqrt{k\nu}}, \quad v_r = kr F'(\eta) + U\cos\theta G(\eta), \quad v_\theta= - U\sin\theta G(\eta), \quad v_z = - 2\sqrt{k\nu} F(\eta)$$

where $$U$$ is the translational speed of the wall and $$V$$ is the injection (or, suction) velocity at the wall. The problem is axisymmetric only when $$U=0$$. The pressure is given by


 * $$\frac{p-p_o}{\rho} = - \frac{1}{2} k^2 r^2 - 2k\nu (F^2+F')$$

The Navier–Stokes equations then reduce to



\begin{align} F'+ 2FF - F'^2 + 1 &=0,\\ G'' + 2 F G' - F' G &=0 \end{align}$$

along with boundary conditions,


 * $$F(0)=\gamma, \quad F'(0)=0, \quad F'(\infty)=1, \quad G(0)=1, \quad G(\infty) = 0.$$

When $$U=V=0$$, the classical Homann problem is recovered.

Plane counterflows
Jets emerging from a slot-jets creates stagnation point in between according to potential theory. The flow near the stagnation point can by studied using self-similar solution. This setup is widely used in combustion experiments. The initial study of impinging stagnation flows are due to C.Y. Wang. Let two fluids with constant properties denoted with suffix $$1(\text{top}),\ 2(\text{bottom})$$ flowing from opposite direction impinge, and assume the two fluids are immiscible and the interface (located at $$y=0$$) is planar. The velocity is given by


 * $$u_1 = k_1 x, \quad v_1 = -k_1y, \quad u_2 = k_2 x, \quad v_2 =-k_2y$$

where $$k_1, \ k_2$$ are strain rates of the fluids. At the interface, velocities, tangential stress and pressure must be continuous. Introducing the self-similar transformation,


 * $$\eta_1 = \sqrt{\frac{\nu_1}{k_1}} y, \quad u_1 = k_1x F_1', \quad v_1 = -\sqrt{\nu_1 k_1} F_1$$
 * $$\eta_2 = \sqrt{\frac{\nu_2}{k_2}} y, \quad u_2 = k_2x F_2', \quad v_2 = -\sqrt{\nu_2 k_2} F_2$$

results equations,


 * $$F_1' + F_1F_1 -F_1'^2 + 1 =0, \quad \frac{p_{o1}-p_1}{\rho_1} = \frac{1}{2} k_1^2x^2 + k_1\nu_1 F_1' + \frac{1}{2} k_1\nu_1 F_1^2$$
 * $$F_2' + F_2F_2 -F_2'^2 + 1 =0, \quad \frac{p_{o2}-p_2}{\rho_2} = \frac{1}{2} k_2^2x^2 + k_2\nu_2 F_2' + \frac{1}{2} k_2\nu_2 F_2^2.$$

The no-penetration condition at the interface and free stream condition far away from the stagnation plane become


 * $$F_1(0)=0, \quad F_1'(\infty)=1, \quad F_2(0)=0, \quad F_2'(-\infty)=1.$$

But the equations require two more boundary conditions. At $$\eta=0$$, the tangential velocities $$u_1=u_2$$, the tangential stress $$\rho_1\nu_1 \partial u_1/\partial y=\rho_2\nu_2 \partial u_2/\partial y$$ and the pressure $$p_1=p_2$$ are continuous. Therefore,



\begin{align} k_1 F_1'(0)&=k_2 F_2'(0),\\ \rho_1 \sqrt{\nu_1 k_1^3} F_1(0)&= \rho_2 \sqrt{\nu_2 k_2^3} F_2(0),\\ p_{o1}-\rho_1\nu_1 k_1 F_1'(0)&= p_{o2}-\rho_2\nu_2 k_2 F_2'(0). \end{align} $$

where $$\rho_1 k_1^2 = \rho_2 k_2^2$$ (from outer inviscid problem) is used. Both $$F_i'(0), F_i(0)$$ are not known apriori'', but derived from matching conditions. The third equation is determine variation of outer pressure $$p_{o1}-p_{o2}$$ due to the effect of viscosity. So there are only two parameters, which governs the flow, which are


 * $$\Lambda = \frac{k_1}{k_2} = \left(\frac{\rho_2}{\rho_1}\right)^{1/2}, \quad \Gamma = \frac{\nu_2}{\nu_1}$$

then the boundary conditions become


 * $$F_1'(0)=\Lambda F_2'(0), \quad F_1(0)= \sqrt{\frac{\Gamma}{\Lambda}}F_2(0)$$.