Talk:Ömer Nasuhi Bilmen

Source reliability
I can see how the first two sources could be construed as unreliable, but I agree with the article's creator that the last two sources are reliable, and assuming that they corroborate with the first two, I believe we can keep them on the reference list. I accepted this article mainly on the point of the last two sources (the encyclopedia and the book), but I nevertheless believe the author should take some time into improving the article's sourcing.

Also, I removed the comments about sourcing from the article page; these comments should usually be left on the reviewer's talk page. GeneralPoxter (talk) 16:18, 29 May 2020 (UTC)