Talk:...Re

RfD
On 2016 Apr 17, this redirect was nominated to RfD. That discussion was itself triggered by a requested move discussion closed on Apr 9. The RfD debate showed a clear consensus against deletion but no clear consensus about the optimal target for this redirect. Editors debating the fate of this redirect should please thoroughly review the two previous discussions before editing. Thanks. Rossami (talk) 21:19, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
 * I've BOLDly retargeted to the disambiguation page at Re, after contacting Rossami about the matter. While the RfD had no clear consensus, the RM had very clear consensus that "...Re" was ambiguous. IMO, it really should've been retargeted at that point, and I suggest this is a more appropriate status quo from which to discuss the matter further, if it comes up. --BDD (talk) 15:29, 2 May 2016 (UTC)