Talk:10 Palace Gate

Untitled
Is it supposed to be good? The only merit claimed is that it has differing ceiling heights (and no one thought of that before modernism, did they!?).
 * its a grade II* listed building, unusual for a building of this date. Justinc 00:25, 2 January 2006 (UTC)

Dead link
During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!


 * http://www.rbkc.gov.uk/Planning/scripts/listeddetails.asp?ID=38/18
 * In 10 Palace Gate on 2011-05-23 02:08:09, 404 Not Found
 * In 10 Palace Gate on 2011-06-20 03:47:24, 404 Not Found

--JeffGBot (talk) 03:47, 20 June 2011 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on 10 Palace Gate. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added tag to http://www.designmuseum.org/design/index.php?id=126
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070927191839/http://www.rbkc.gov.uk/Planning/scripts/listeddetails.asp?ID=38%2F18 to http://www.rbkc.gov.uk/Planning/scripts/listeddetails.asp?ID=38%2F18

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 21:03, 16 January 2018 (UTC)